Artificial Autonomy or Relational Intelligence

Author:

Ho Anita

Abstract

Abstract This chapter explains how a liberal account of autonomy is too individualistic and narrow to adequately capture the impact of the rapid proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) health monitoring technologies on people’s ability to determine how they would like health monitoring and data collection/sharing to take place. It follows Catriona Mackenzie’s tripartite conceptualization of autonomy (self-governance, self-determination, and self-authorization) and argues for a constitutively relational approach that problematizes the rapid development and adoption of AI health monitoring technologies. This conceptualization centers relationships and power asymmetries in bioethical analysis, and underscores how relationships can enhance or deprive people’s ability to exercise autonomy.

Publisher

Oxford University PressNew York

Reference517 articles.

1. ‘The Body Does Not Lie’: Identity, Risk and Trust in Technoculture.;Crime, Media, Culture

2. Binyam Negussie Desta, Ashok Chaurasia, and Shanil Ebrahim. “The Use of Artificially Intelligent Self-Diagnosing Digital Platforms by the General Public: Scoping Review.”;JMIR Medical Informatics

3. Defining and Measuring Primary Medication Nonadherence: Development of a Quality Measure.;Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy

4. Machine Learning and Health Care Disparities in Dermatology.;JAMA Dermatology,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3