Affiliation:
1. Department of Pathology, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, and (address for correspondence) Clinical Laboratories, Box 146, The University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, IL 60637
Abstract
Abstract
We evaluated the EMITTM Cyclosporine Assay (Syva Co., Palo Alto, CA), using the Cobas-Mira analyzer to assess the precision, accuracy, and analytical recovery from whole-blood samples supplemented with cyclosporine. We also performed comparative analysis of whole-blood samples containing cyclosporine from liver and kidney transplant patients by using EMIT, HPLC, and RIA (IncStar Cyclo-Trac, SP assay). Before assay by EMIT or RIA, cyclosporine was extracted from whole blood with methanol. For the HPLC method, whole blood containing cyclosporine was hemolyzed with 300 mL/L acetonitrile in water; cyclosporine was extracted from the hemolysate with acetonitrile. The within-run and between-run CVs for the EMIT assay of cyclospoprine were 9.9% (means = 72.6, SD = 7.2 μg/L; n = 20) and 13.5% (means = 75.0, SD = 10.1 μg/L; n = 26) for the low control; 3.5% (means = 194.7, SD = 6.8 μg/L; n = 20) and 8.1% (means = 189.0, SD = 15.3 μg/L; n = 26) for the medium control; and 7.0% (means = 332.5, SD = 23.3 μg/L; n = 20) and 7.1% (means = 340.0, SD = 24.2 μg/L; n = 24) for the high control (Bio-Rad, whole-blood controls). Analytical recovery of cyclosporine from drug-supplemented samples averaged 99% for EMIT, 104% for HPLC, and 90% for RIA over a concentration range of 50-500 μg/L. Analysis of 196 specimens by HPLC (x) vs EMIT (y) gave the following regression statistics: y = 1.27x + 16.44; IncStar‘s RIA (x‘) vs EMIT: y = 1.12x‘ - 2.50; HPLC vs RIA: x‘ = 1.10x + 23.87.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Biochemistry, medical,Clinical Biochemistry
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献