Solving the problem of antibody interference in commercial "sandwich"-type immunoassays of carcinoembryonic antigen.

Abstract

Abstract We evaluated the effect of human anti-murine antibodies (HAMA) on apparent concentrations of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as measured in serum with commercial enzyme immunoassay (EIA) kits manufactured by Abbot ("two-step" double monoclonal antibody assay), Roche, and Hybritech (room-temperature protocol). In sera from patients given parenteral murine monoclonal antibody for experimental diagnostic and immunotherapy studies, HAMA titers were determined with Immunomedics' "ImmuSTRIP HAMA-EIA" kit reagents. "True" CEA titers were established by using the ImmuCEA/MA-EIA and heat-extraction to destroy HAMA before assay for CEA. The concordance of the ImmuCEA/MA assay with the Abbott and Roche CEA EIAs was established with sera from normal individuals and from patients who had not received parenteral injections of murine monoclonal antibody. At high (100 mg/L) concentrations of HAMA, false-positive results were observed with all three kits. The Hybritech and Roche assays were more sensitive to interference by HAMA than was the Abbott CEA-EIA, false-positive results being observed at HAMA concentrations between 1 and 10 mg/L. Similar sensitivity of the three kits to interference by primate anti-MAb sera was demonstrated. Use of primate anti-MAb sera to create controls with HAMA activity and of analyte is recommended to evaluate MAb assays for potential HAMA interference and for use to devise methods to eliminate HAMA interference.