Performance of the Glucose Management Indicator (GMI) in Type 2 Diabetes

Author:

Fang Michael1ORCID,Wang Dan1,Rooney Mary R1ORCID,Echouffo-Tcheugui Justin B12ORCID,Coresh Josef12,Aurora R Nisha3,Punjabi Naresh M4,Selvin Elizabeth1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore, MD , USA

2. Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine , Baltimore, MD , USA

3. Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School , New Brunswick, NJ , USA

4. Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine , Miami, FL , USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe glucose management indicator (GMI) is an estimated measure of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) recommended for the management of persons with diabetes using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). However, GMI was derived primarily in young adults with type 1 diabetes, and its performance in patients with type 2 diabetes is poorly characterized.MethodsWe conducted a prospective cohort study in 144 adults with obstructive sleep apnea and type 2 diabetes not using insulin (mean age: 59.4 years; 45.1% female). HbA1c was measured at the study screening visit. Participants simultaneously wore 2 CGM sensors (Dexcom G4 and Abbott Libre Pro) for up to 4 weeks (2 weeks at baseline and 2 weeks at the 3-month follow-up visit). GMI was calculated using all available CGM data for each sensor.ResultsMedian wear time was 27 days (IQR: 23–29) for the Dexcom G4 and 28 days (IQR: 24–29) for the Libre Pro. The mean difference between HbA1c and GMI was small (0.12–0.14 percentage points) (approximately 2 mmol/mol). However, the 2 measures were only moderately correlated (r = 0.68–0.71), and there was substantial variability in GMI at any given value of HbA1c (root mean squared error: 0.66–0.69 percentage points [7 to 8 mmol/mol]). Between 36% and 43% of participants had an absolute difference between HbA1c and GMI ≥0.5 percentage points (≥5 mmol/mol), and 9% to 18% had an absolute difference >1 percentage points (>11 mmol/mol). Discordance was higher in the Libre Pro than the Dexcom G4.ConclusionsGMI may be an unreliable measure of glycemic control for patients with type 2 diabetes and should be interpreted cautiously in clinical practice.Clinicaltrials.gov Registration Number: NCT02454153.

Funder

NIH/NHLBI

NIH/NIDDK

NIH/NIA

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3