Affiliation:
1. Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
Abstract
Abstract
There are many alternative ways of estimating free thyroxine (T4) when thyrotropin screening results are abnormal. In addition to free T4 immunoassays, the menu of most automated immunoassay instruments includes a nonisotopic version of the original triiodothyronine (T3)-uptake assay called "T-uptake." We evaluated the ability of five such assays (Access, ES-300, IMx, Magnum Opus, and Stratus) to accurately estimate the free thyroxine index (FTI) in euthyroid, hyperthyroid, and hypothyroid patients with abnormal concentrations of thyroid hormone-binding proteins, and in patients with nonthyroidal illness. For comparison, we calculated a similar FTI, using either T3-uptake or direct measurement of thyroxine-binding globulin (TBG). Euthyroid reference ranges were comparable. Of euthyroid patients with increased TBG, 12-32% and 5-20% had increased or suppressed FTI, respectively, depending on the T-uptake method used. Except for IMx, 6-35% of hypothyroid patients with increased TBG had inappropriately increased FTI. Patients with nonthyroidal illness had comparable results regardless of the method used, and T-uptake methods were variably affected by known inhibitors of thyroid hormone binding. The most reliable T-uptake method appeared to be the IMx, which, despite claims that it measures all thyroid hormone-binding proteins, correlated best with TBG concentrations.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Biochemistry, medical,Clinical Biochemistry
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献