Utility of Clinical Chemical Determinations of Drug Concentrations in Biological Fluids

Author:

Vesell Elliot S1,Passananti G Thomas1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pharmacology, M. S. Hershey Medical Center, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pa. 17033

Abstract

Abstract Iatrogenic drug toxicity has become a major medical problem. An approach to avoiding adverse reactions arising from drug accumulation is suggested and explored in depth. Large differences in the rates at which individuals metabolize several commonly used drugs are reviewed, because they illustrate the dangers of prescribing drugs solely according to body weight or surface area, and they emphasize the need for more satisfactory guidelines. Direct measurement of certain drugs in blood is suggested as a convenient, economical, and reliable solution to this problem. In healthy nonmedicated subjects, rates of decay of certain drugs are highly reproducible. In spite of large, genetically controlled differences among subjects in rates of drug metabolism, individuals do not vary significantly with respect to the pharmacological effects produced by certain well-defined blood concentrations of most drugs. For this reason, blood concentrations of most drugs may be conveniently divided into three separate ranges: the low range of therapeutic ineffectiveness; the intermediate range, in which the pharmacologic activity of the drug with negligible toxic side reactions is produced; and, finally, the toxic range. Because many potent drugs with a narrow therapeutic index are in use today—both alone and in combination—it is extremely difficult for the physician to maintain his patients consistently within the therapeutic range and outside of the ineffective or toxic range. Toxicity could be appreciably decreased if this approach of measuring drug concentrations in blood were more widely used in selecting and modifying drug dosage. Clinical advantages and limitations of measuring drug concentrations in blood, as well as the pharmacologic and genetic principles underlying them, are discussed.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Biochemistry, medical,Clinical Biochemistry

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3