Affiliation:
1. Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Abstract
AbstractThis article appeals to virtue ethics to help guide laboratory animal research by considering the role of character and flourishing in these practices. Philosophical approaches to animal research ethics have typically focused on animal rights or on the promotion of welfare for all affected, while animal research itself has been guided in its practice by the 3Rs (reduction, refinement, replacement). These different approaches have sometimes led to an impasse in debates over animal research where the philosophical approaches are focused on whether or when animal studies are justifiable, while the 3Rs assume a general justification for animal work but aim to reduce harm to sentient animals and increase their welfare in laboratory spaces. Missing in this exchange is a moral framework that neither assumes nor rejects the justifiability of animal research and focuses instead on the habits and structures of that work. I shall propose a place for virtue ethics in laboratory animal research by considering examples of relevant character traits, the moral significance of human-animal bonds, mentorship in the laboratory, and the importance of animals flourishing beyond mere welfare.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,Animal Science and Zoology,General Medicine
Reference68 articles.
1. Office for Life Sciences. Public attitudes to animal research;Ipsos,2020
2. Gallup poll social series: values and beliefs;Jones,2019
3. Battle scars;Cressey;Nature,2011
4. Modern moral philosophy;Anscombe;Philosophy.,1958
5. On some vices of virtue ethics;Louden;Am Philos Q.,1984
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献