Kidney function and the comparative effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants vs. warfarin in adults with atrial fibrillation: a multicenter observational study

Author:

Jun Min1ORCID,Scaria Anish1,Andrade Jason2,Badve Sunil V1,Birks Peter23,Bota Sarah E4,Campain Anna1,Djurdjev Ognjenka5,Garg Amit X46,Ha Jeffrey1,Harel Ziv7,Hemmelgarn Brenda8,Hockham Carinna9ORCID,James Matthew T1011,Jardine Meg J12,Levin Adeera235,McArthur Eric4,Ravani Pietro10,Shao Selena5,Sood Manish M13,Tan Zhi10,Tangri Navdeep1415,Whitlock Reid1415ORCID,Gallagher Martin116

Affiliation:

1. The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney , Newtown, NSW 2042 , Australia

2. University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital , Vancouver, BC , Canada

3. Division of Nephrology, University of British Columbia , Vancouver, BC , Canada

4. ICES , ON , Canada

5. BC Renal , Vancouver, BC , Canada

6. Department of Medicine, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University , London, ON, Canada

7. Division of Nephrology, St. Michael's Hospital , Toronto, ON , Canada

8. Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta , Edmonton, AB , Canada

9. The George Institute for Global Health, Imperial College London , London , UK

10. Cumming School of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Calgary , Calgary AB , Canada

11. Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, University of Calgary, Calgary , AB , Canada

12. NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney , Sydney, NSW , Australia

13. The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital , Ottawa, ON , Canada

14. Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba , Winnipeg, MB , Canada

15. Seven Oaks Hospital Chronic Disease Innovation Centre , Winnipeg, MB , Canada

16. Liverpool Clinical School, UNSW Sydney , Sydney, NSW Australia

Abstract

Abstract Aims The aim of this study was to determine the comparative effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin in adults with atrial fibrillation (AF) by level of kidney function. Methods and results We pooled findings from five retrospective cohorts (2011–18) across Australia and Canada of adults with; a new dispensation for a DOAC or warfarin, an AF diagnosis, and a measure of baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The outcomes of interest, within 1 year from the cohort entry date, were: (1) the composite of all-cause death, first hospitalization for ischaemic stroke, or transient ischaemic attack (effectiveness), and (2) first hospitalization for major bleeding defined as an intracranial, upper or lower gastrointestinal, or other bleeding (safety). Cox models were used to examine the association of a DOAC vs. warfarin with outcomes, after 1:1 matching via a propensity score. Kidney function was categorized as eGFR ≥60, 45–59, 30–44, and <30 mL/min/1.73 m2. A total of 74 542 patients were included in the matched analysis. DOAC initiation was associated with greater or similar effectiveness compared with warfarin initiation across all eGFR categories [pooled HRs (95% CIs) for eGFR categories: 0.74(0.69–0.79), 0.76(0.54–1.07), 0.68(0.61–0.75) and 0.86(0.76–0.98)], respectively. DOAC initiation was associated with lower or similar risk of major bleeding than warfarin initiation [pooled HRs (95% CIs): 0.75(0.65–0.86), 0.81(0.65–1.01), 0.82(0.66–1.02), and 0.71(0.52–0.99), respectively). Associations between DOAC initiation, compared with warfarin initiation, and study outcomes were not modified by eGFR category. Conclusion DOAC use, compared with warfarin use, was associated with a lower or similar risk of all-cause death, ischaemic stroke, and transient ischaemic attack and also a lower or similar risk of major bleeding across all levels of kidney function.

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Health Policy

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3