Does heart failure-specific health status identify patients with bothersome symptoms, depression, anxiety, and/or poorer spiritual well-being?

Author:

Flint Kelsey M12,Fairclough Diane L3,Spertus John A4,Bekelman David B256

Affiliation:

1. Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Cardiology, Department of Medicine, 1700 North Wheeling Street, Aurora, CO, USA

2. Colorado Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Consortium, 13199 E Montview Blvd, Suite 300, Mail Stop F443, Denver, CO, USA

3. Department of Biostatics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, 13199 E Montview Blvd, Suite 339, Aurora, CO, USA

4. Saint Luke’s Mid America Heart Institute, University of Missouri-Kansas City, 4401 Wornall Rd, Kansas City, MO, USA

5. Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, 1700 North Wheeling Street, Aurora, CO, USA

6. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, 12631 E 17th Ave, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA

Abstract

Abstract Aims Patients with heart failure often have under-recognized symptoms, depression, anxiety, and poorer spiritual well-being (‘QoL domains’). Ideally all patients should have heart failure-specific health status and quality of life (QoL) domains routinely evaluated; however, lack of time and resources are limiting in most clinical settings. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate whether heart failure-specific health status was associated with QoL domains and to identify a score warranting further evaluation of QoL domain deficits. Methods and results Participants (N = 314) enrolled in the Collaborative Care to Alleviate Symptoms and Adjust to Illness trial completed measures of heart failure-specific health status [Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, KCCQ (score 0–100, 0 = worst health status)], additional symptoms (Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), and spiritual well-being (Facit-Sp) at baseline. Mean ± standard deviation (SD) KCCQ score was 46.9 ± 19.3, mean age was 65.5 ± 11.4, and 79% were male. Prevalence of QoL domain deficits ranged from 11% (nausea) to 47% (depression). Sensitivity/specificity of KCCQ for each QoL domain ranged from 20–40%/80–96% for KCCQ ≤ 25, 61–84%/48–62% for KCCQ ≤ 50, 84–97%/26–40% for KCCQ ≤ 60, and 96–100%/8–13% for KCCQ ≤ 75. Patients with KCCQ ≤ 60 had mean ± SD 4.5 ± 2.5 QoL domain deficits (maximum 12), vs. 1.6 ± 1.6 for KCCQ > 60 (P < 0.001). Similar results were seen for KCCQ ≤25 (6.6 ± 2.4 vs. 3.3 ± 2.4), KCCQ ≤ 50 (4.8 ± 2.6 vs. 2.5 ± 2) and KCCQ ≤ 75 (4.0 ± 2.6 vs. 1.0 ± 1.2) (all P < 00001). Conclusion KCCQ ≤ 60 had good sensitivity for each QoL domain deficit and for patients with at least one QoL domain deficit. Screening for QoL domain deficits should target patients with lower KCCQ scores based on a clinic’s KCCQ score distribution and clinical resources for addressing QoL domain deficits.

Funder

National Institute of Nursing Research

National Institutes of Health

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences Colorado Clinical and Translational Science Awards

Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Health Policy

Reference45 articles.

1. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines;Yancy;Circulation,2013

2. Symptom burden, depression, and spiritual well-being: a comparison of heart failure and advanced cancer patients;Bekelman;J Gen Intern Med,2009

3. Palliative care in heart failure;Kavalieratos;J Am Coll Cardiol,2017

4. Utility of patient-reported outcome instruments in heart failure;Kelkar;JACC Heart Fail,2016

5. Implementation of real-time assessment of patient-reported outcomes in a heart failure clinic: a feasibility study;Stehlik;J Card Fail,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3