A Case-Control Study Examining Disparities in Clinical Trial Participation Among Breast Surgical Oncology Patients

Author:

Fayanju Oluwadamilola M12345ORCID,Ren Yi6,Thomas Samantha M67,Greenup Rachel A123,Hyslop Terry67,Hwang E Shelley12,Stewart John H89

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA

2. Women’s Cancer Program, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA

3. Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA

4. Duke Forge, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

5. Department of Surgery, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA

6. Biostatistics Shared Resource, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA

7. Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA

8. Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA

9. Department of Surgery, University of Illinois Cancer Center, Chicago, IL, USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundClinical trial participation among racial and ethnic minorities remains low despite national efforts. We sought to determine how participation in clinical trials by breast surgical oncology patients has changed over time and what characteristics are associated with participation.MethodsWomen with breast cancer enrolled in National Cancer Institute–sponsored, cooperative-group trials from 2000 to 2012 and who underwent oncologic surgery (n = 17 125) were compared with trial-eligible women in the National Cancer Database diagnosed in 2000–2012 (n = 792 719). Race-specific trial participation was plotted over time by income and reported as a proportion of the combined cohorts. Factors associated with trial participation were estimated using logistic regression; we report odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A P value less than  .05 was considered statistically significant for all analyses. All tests were two-sided.ResultsParticipation declined across all groups over time because of a decrease in the scale and number of trials. In 2000–2003, Asian–Pacific Islander (7.17%), Hispanic (3.48%), and white (7.13%) patients from the highest income group had higher participation than their lower-income counterparts (Asian–Pacific Islander: 3.95%; Hispanic: 2.67%; white: 5.96%), but by 2008–2012, only high-income white patients participated more than lower-income whites (0.32% vs 0.25%, all P < .01). Black (OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.75 to 0.85) and Hispanic (OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.77 to 0.92) patients were less likely to participate than whites, but there were statistically significant interactions between income and race and ethnicity, with high-income black patients being approximately 50% less likely to participate than lower-income blacks (all P < .001).ConclusionsMultifaceted interventions addressing the intersectionality of race, ethnicity, and other patient characteristics are needed to address persistent disparities in trial participation among breast surgical oncology patients.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health

National Institutes of Health Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women’s Health

Wake Forest University School of Medicine

National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health

Duke Cancer Institute

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3