Survivorship care in breast cancer: understanding implementation barriers through the lens of the Theoretical Domains Framework

Author:

Brauer Eden R12ORCID,Petersen Laura2ORCID,Ganz Patricia A234

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing, University of California Los Angeles , Los Angeles, CA, USA

2. Center for Cancer Prevention and Control Research, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Los Angeles , Los Angeles, CA, USA

3. Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA , Los Angeles, CA, USA

4. Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles , Los Angeles, CA, USA

Abstract

Abstract Background Breast cancer survivorship guidelines with specific recommendations on managing long-term effects are available, but uptake in clinical practice remains low. Using the lens of the Theoretical Domains Framework, we aimed to understand key factors in guideline-concordant management of long-term effects to inform future implementation efforts in clinical practice contexts. Methods As part of a broader survey of oncologists, a theory-guided questionnaire was developed. Oncologists were asked to report level of agreement with Theoretical Domains Framework–based statements, current usage and perceived value of survivorship resources, and frequency of managing long-term effects in routine care. Data analyses included psychometric assessment of the questionnaire, descriptive summaries of theoretical domains and survivorship resources, and multivariable logistic regression models. Results In total, 217 oncologists completed the Theoretical Domains Framework–based questionnaire; 54% of oncologists reported “always or almost always” evaluating physical effects at routine survivorship appointments, while 34% did so for psychosocial effects. In regression models, Environmental Context and Resources was the only theoretical domain found to be statistically significantly associated with “always or almost always” evaluating both physical (odds ratio = 0.29, 95% confidence interval = 0.09 to 0.80) and psychosocial (odds ratio = 0.09, 95% confidence interval = 0.02 to 0.35) effects. Conclusions Findings support application of the Theoretical Domains Framework in understanding oncologists’ behaviors and perceived barriers in managing long-term effects in breast cancer survivors. In future implementation efforts, this theory-informed approach can be used to target relevant domains and strategies focused on embedding guideline recommendations in the clinical context through structured resources and environmental supports.

Funder

Komen Scholar

Susan G. Komen Foundation

Breast Cancer Research Foundation

National Institutes of Health

National Cancer Institute

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Reference65 articles.

1. Cancer statistics, 2023;Siegel;CA Cancer J Clin,2023

2. Cancer statistics, 2021;Siegel;CA Cancer J Clin,2021

3. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2022;Miller;CA Cancer J Clin,2022

4. Management of common clinical problems experienced by survivors of cancer;Emery;Lancet,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3