Cirrus: An Automated Mammography-Based Measure of Breast Cancer Risk Based on Textural Features

Author:

Schmidt Daniel F12,Makalic Enes1,Goudey Benjamin13,Dite Gillian S1,Stone Jennifer14,Nguyen Tuong L1,Dowty James G1,Baglietto Laura5,Southey Melissa C67,Maskarinec Gertraud8,Giles Graham G19,Hopper John L1

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

2. Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia

3. IBM Australia - Research, Southbank, Victoria, Australia

4. Curtin UWA Centre for Genetic Origins of Health and Disease, Curtin University, and the University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia

5. Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

6. Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia

7. Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia

8. University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI

9. Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Abstract

Abstract Background We applied machine learning to find a novel breast cancer predictor based on information in a mammogram. Methods Using image-processing techniques, we automatically processed 46 158 analog mammograms for 1345 cases and 4235 controls from a cohort and case–control study of Australian women, and a cohort study of Japanese American women, extracting 20 textural features not based on pixel brightness threshold. We used Bayesian lasso regression to create individual- and mammogram-specific measures of breast cancer risk, Cirrus. We trained and tested measures across studies. We fitted Cirrus with conventional mammographic density measures using logistic regression, and computed odds ratios (OR) per standard deviation adjusted for age and body mass index. Results Combining studies, almost all textural features were associated with case–control status. The ORs for Cirrus measures trained on one study and tested on another study ranged from 1.56 to 1.78 (all P < 10−6). For the Cirrus measure derived from combining studies, the OR was 1.90 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.73 to 2.09), equivalent to a fourfold interquartile risk ratio, and was little attenuated after adjusting for conventional measures. In contrast, the OR for the conventional measure was 1.34 (95% CI = 1.25 to 1.43), and after adjusting for Cirrus it became 1.16 (95% CI = 1.08 to 1.24; P = 4 × 10−5). Conclusions A fully automated personal risk measure created from combining textural image features performs better at predicting breast cancer risk than conventional mammographic density risk measures, capturing half the risk-predicting ability of the latter measures. In terms of differentiating affected and unaffected women on a population basis, Cirrus could be one of the strongest known risk factors for breast cancer.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Reference27 articles.

1. Mammographic density phenotypes and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis;Pettersson;J Natl Cancer Inst,2014

2. Explaining variance in the Cumulus mammographic measures that predict breast cancer risk: a twins and sisters study;Nguyen;Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev,2013

3. Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer by mode of detection and tumor size: a case-control study;Krishnan;Breast Cancer Res,2016

4. Inference about causation from examination of familial confounding: application to longitudinal twin data on mammographic density measures that predict breast cancer risk;Stone;Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev,2012

5. Mammographic density defined by higher than conventional brightness thresholds better predicts breast cancer risk;Nguyen;Int J Epidemiol,2017

Cited by 25 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3