Comparison of different methods for estimating the geoid-to-quasi-geoid separation-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comparison of different methods for estimating the geoid-to-quasi-geoid separation

Published:2017-05-19 Issue:2 Volume:210 Page:1001-1020
ISSN:0956-540X
Container-title:Geophysical Journal International
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Foroughi Ismael^ORCID,Tenzer Robert

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Geochemistry and Petrology,Geophysics

Link

http://academic.oup.com/gji/article-pdf/210/2/1001/18275279/ggx221.pdf

Reference58 articles.

1. Estimation of Helmertorthometric heights using digital barcode levelling, observed gravity and topographic mass-density data over part of Darling Scarp, Western Australia;Geom. Res. Aust.,2001

2. The analytical continuation bias in geoid determination using potential coefficients and terrestrial gravity data;J. Geod.,2004

3. Geoid-to-quasigeoid separation computed using the GRACE/GOCE global geopotential model GOCO02S—a case study of Himalayas, Tibet and central Siberia;Terr. Atmos. Ocean Sci.,2013

Cited by 21 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The effect of topographic density variations on the geoid and orthometric heights in Hong Kong;Geodesy and Geodynamics;2024-09

2. A conversion of the geoid to the quasigeoid at the Hong Kong territories;Applied Geomatics;2024-06-20

3. Accurate Height Determination in Uneven Terrains with Integration of Global Navigation Satellite System Technology and Geometric Levelling: A Case Study in Lebanon;Computation;2024-03-13

4. Determination of the Geoid–Quasigeoid Separation Using GGI Method;Remote Sensing;2024-02-26

5. A detailed rock density model of the Hong Kong territories;Geodesy and Geodynamics;2024-01