Affiliation:
1. Research Department , Statistics Norway
Abstract
Summary:
This paper provides a structural panel GMM (P-GMM) estimator of the elasticity of substitution between capital and labour that does not depend on external instruments, and which can be applied in the presence of biased technical change. We identify the conditions under which P-GMM is a consistent estimator and compare it to a fixed effects estimator. Using a Monte Carlo study, we find that the P-GMM estimator is nearly unbiased provided the number of time periods (T) is not too small. We show analytically how the small-T bias is related to metrics of weak identification. In an application on manufacturing firms in Norway, we estimate the elasticity of substitution to be 1.9 using the P-GMM and 1.0 using the fixed effects estimator. Neglecting simultaneity may thus lead to the conclusion that capital and labour are complements or can be described by Cobb–Douglas technology, when, in fact, they are substitutes.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference52 articles.
1. Directed technical change;Acemoglu;Review of Economic Studies,2002
2. Capital-labor substitution, structural change, and growth;Alvarez-Cuadrado;Theoretical Economics,2017
3. The elusive pro-competitive effects of trade;Arkolakis;Review of Economic Studies,2018
4. Puzzling exchange rate dynamics and delayed portfolio adjustment;Bacchetta;Journal of International Economics,2021
5. Chapter 18: Taxation and saving;Bernheim,2002
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献