Affiliation:
1. University of California, San Diego, USA
Abstract
Abstract
The traditional claim in the literature on religion and science is that exposure to science leads to secularity because the claims about the natural world in the two systems are incompatible. More recently, research has narrowed this claim and shown that conflict over knowledge in the USA is primarily limited to one religion—conservative Protestantism—and only to a few fact claims. In this paper, I test this claim using longitudinal data from matched surveys taken in students’ first and fourth year of university. I find no evidence that the science is more secularizing than nonscience. I then turn to a distinction in university majors long used by sociologists of education—between majors focused on inquiry versus those focused on applying knowledge—and find that majors focused on inquiry are more likely to secularize than those focused on application. I interpret this to mean that learning to inquire secularizes.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Religious studies
Reference50 articles.
1. “Specifying the Impact of Conservative Protestantism on Educational Attainment.”;Beyerlein;Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion,2004
2. “The Characteristics of Subject Matter in Different Academic Areas.”;Biglan;Journal of Applied Psychology,1973
3. “Selection Versus Socialization? Interrogating the Sources of Secularity in Global Science.”;Bolger;Sociological Perspectives,2019
4. “Disciplinary Categories, Majors, and Undergraduate Academic Experiences: Rethinking Bok’s ‘Underachieving Colleges’ Thesis.”;Brint,2012
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献