Community-Based versus Statistical Targeting of Anti-Poverty Programs: Evidence from Burkina Faso

Author:

Hillebrecht Michael123,Klonner Stefan2,A Pacere Noraogo4,Souares Aurélia3

Affiliation:

1. German Society of International Cooperation (GIZ), Eschborn, Germany

2. South Asia Institute, Department of Development Economics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany

3. Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany

4. Centre de Recherche en Santé de Nouna, Nouna, Burkina Faso

Abstract

Abstract Targeting of governmental welfare programmes in low-income countries commonly relies on statistical procedures involving household-level data, while smaller-scale programmes often employ community-based targeting, where village communities themselves identify beneficiaries. Combining original data from community-based targeting exercises in Burkina Faso with a household survey we compare the targeting accuracy of community-based targeting with four common statistical targeting methods when the objective is to target consumption-poor households. We find that community-based targeting is substantially less accurate than statistical targeting in villages, while it is as accurate as the much more costly statistical methods in semi-urban areas. We show that this difference is due to differences in poverty concepts held by rural and urban communities. Its large cost advantage makes community-based targeting far more cost-effective than statistical targeting for common amounts of welfare programme benefits.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Development

Reference77 articles.

1. Socioeconomic stratification by wealth ranking: Is it valid?;Adams;World Development,1997

2. Weighing what’s practical: Proxy means tests for targeting food subsidies in Egypt;Ahmed;Food Policy,2002

3. Alternative cash transfer delivery mechanisms: Impacts on routine preventative health clinic visits in Burkina Faso;Akresh,2014

4. Targeting the poor: Evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia;Alatas;American Economic Review,2012

5. Does elite capture matter? Local elites and targeted welfare programs in Indonesia;Alatas,2013

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3