Impact of echocardiographic analyses of valvular event timing on myocardial work indices

Author:

Olsen Flemming Javier123ORCID,Bjerregaard Caroline Løkke12,Skaarup Kristoffer Grundtvig12ORCID,Lassen Mats Christian Højbjerg12,Johansen Niklas Dyrby123ORCID,Modin Daniel12,Jensen Gorm Boje2ORCID,Schnohr Peter2,Søgaard Peter45,Gislason Gunnar15ORCID,Svendsen Jesper Hastrup56ORCID,Møgelvang Rasmus567,Biering-Sørensen Tor123ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital—Herlev and Gentofte , 2900 Hellerup , Denmark

2. The Copenhagen City Heart Study, Copenhagen University Hospital—Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg , 2000 Copenhagen , Denmark

3. Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen , 2200 Copenhagen , Denmark

4. Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital—North Zealand , 3400 Hilleroed , Denmark

5. Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen , 2200 Copenhagen , Denmark

6. Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital—Rigshospitalet , 2100 Copenhagen , Denmark

7. Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark , 5230 Odense , Denmark

Abstract

Abstract Aims Valvular event timing is an integral part of echocardiographic pressure–strain loop (PSL) analyses. The impact that different event timing modalities may have on myocardial work indices is unknown. Methods and results A methodological study was performed on 200 subjects, including 50 healthy subjects, 50 with aortic valve sclerosis, 50 with atrial fibrillation, and 50 with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Valvular event timing was estimated by visual assessment, spectral Doppler, and colour tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) M-mode. These valvular event timings were added to the same PSL analyses sequentially to acquire myocardial work indices, including global work index (GWI). For the 200 participants, the median age was 72 years, 50% were men, and mean blood pressure was 143/80 mmHg. Valvular event timings differed between all three modalities and so did all myocardial work indices. Compared with visual assessment, spectral Doppler resulted in a significantly higher GWI (mean difference: 114 ± 93 mmHg%, P < 0.001), and so did TDI (mean difference: 83 ± 90 mmHg%, P < 0.001). A higher GWI by spectral Doppler than by TDI was also observed (mean difference: 30 ± 53 mmHg%, P < 0.001). In the healthy subgroup, a systematic bias was observed for spectral Doppler compared with visual assessment (mean difference: 160 ± 77 mmHg%, P < 0.001), and a similar trend was noted for TDI vs. visual assessment (mean difference: 124 ± 74 mmHg%, P < 0.001). Conclusion Myocardial work indices differ depending on the event timing modality used, with visual assessment yielding lower GWI values compared with Doppler-based methods. Serial PSL analyses should apply the same event timing method.

Funder

Capital Region of Denmark

Kong Christian den Tiendes Fond

Fru Asta Florida Bolding Mindelegat

Danish Heart Foundation

Fondsbørsvekselerer Henry Hansen og Hustrus Hovedlegat

Lundbeck Foundation

Novo Nordisk Foundation

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

Reference20 articles.

1. A novel clinical method for quantification of regional left ventricular pressure–strain loop area: a non-invasive index of myocardial work;Russell;Eur Heart J,2012

2. The utility of myocardial work in clinical practice;Roemer;J Am Soc Echocardiogr,2021

3. How to measure left ventricular myocardial work by pressure–strain loops;Smiseth;Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging,2021

4. Echocardiographic reference ranges for normal non-invasive myocardial work indices: results from the EACVI NORRE study;Manganaro;Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging,2019

5. Echocardiographic reference ranges for myocardial work in healthy subjects: a preliminary study;Galli;Echocardiography,2019

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Cardiac Valve Event Timing in Echocardiography Using Deep Learning and Triplane Recordings;IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics;2024-05

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3