Machine learning based automated dynamic quantification of left heart chamber volumes

Author:

Narang Akhil1,Mor-Avi Victor1,Prado Aldo2,Volpato Valentina13,Prater David4,Tamborini Gloria3,Fusini Laura3,Pepi Mauro3,Goyal Neha1,Addetia Karima1,Gonçalves Alexandra4,Patel Amit R1,Lang Roberto M1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, 5758 South Maryland Ave, MC 9067 Room 5513, Chicago, IL, USA

2. Centro Privado de Cardiologia, Yerba Buena, Virgen de la Merced 550, Tucumán, Argentina

3. Department of Cardiovascular Imaging, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Via Parea 4, Milan, Italy

4. Philips Healthcare, 3000 Minuteman Road, Andover, MA, USA

Abstract

Abstract Aims Studies have demonstrated the ability of a new automated algorithm for volumetric analysis of 3D echocardiographic (3DE) datasets to provide accurate and reproducible measurements of left ventricular and left atrial (LV, LA) volumes at end-systole and end-diastole. Recently, this methodology was expanded using a machine learning (ML) approach to automatically measure chamber volumes throughout the cardiac cycle, resulting in LV and LA volume–time curves. We aimed to validate ejection and filling parameters obtained from these curves by comparing them to independent well-validated reference techniques. Methods and results We studied 20 patients referred for cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) examinations, who underwent 3DE imaging the same day. Volume–time curves were obtained for both LV and LA chambers using the ML algorithm (Philips HeartModel), and independently conventional 3DE volumetric analysis (TomTec), and CMR images (slice-by-slice, frame-by-frame manual tracing). Automatically derived LV and LA volumes and ejection/filling parameters were compared against both reference techniques. Minor manual correction of the automatically detected LV and LA borders was needed in 4/20 and 5/20 cases, respectively. Time required to generate volume–time curves was 35 ± 17 s using ML algorithm, 3.6 ± 0.9 min using conventional 3DE analysis, and 96 ± 14 min using CMR. Volume–time curves obtained by all three techniques were similar in shape and magnitude. In both comparisons, ejection/filling parameters showed no significant inter-technique differences. Bland–Altman analysis confirmed small biases, despite wide limits of agreement. Conclusion The automated ML algorithm can quickly measure dynamic LV and LA volumes and accurately analyse ejection/filling parameters. Incorporation of this algorithm into the clinical workflow may increase the utilization of 3DE imaging.

Funder

NIH

Philips Healthcare

T32 Cardiovascular Sciences Training

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3