Coercive Control: Patterns in Crimes, Arrests and Outcomes for a New Domestic Abuse Offence

Author:

Brennan Iain1ORCID,Myhill Andy2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Criminology and Sociology, University of Hull, Hull, UK

2. College of Policing, UK

Abstract

Abstract Critics of the criminalization of coercive control warned that the criminal justice system was ill-prepared for a conceptualization of domestic abuse that relies on victim accounts of fear and manipulation rather than on evidence of violence. Using data obtained through Freedom of Information requests to police forces and aggregated police records, this paper presents police force-level and nationwide patterns in recorded crimes, police arrests and crime outcomes for this new crime and shows that, nationally, the number of recorded crimes and arrests rose steadily in its first three years, but there was significant variation in these patterns between police forces. Analysing police outcomes, we demonstrate that coercive control crimes face greater procedural challenges and are far less likely to result in prosecution than domestic abuse crimes in general. We discuss the implications of these trends and findings for the policing and criminalization of coercive control.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Law,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Social Psychology,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference35 articles.

1. ‘Putting Coercive Control into Practice: Problems and Possibilities’;Barlow;British Journal of Criminology,2019

2. ‘Prosecuting Coercive Control: Reforming Storytelling in the Courtroom’;Bettinson;Criminal Law Review,2020

3. ‘Is the Creation of a Discrete Offence of Coercive Control Necessary to Combat Domestic Violence?’;Bishop;Northern Ireland Law Quarterly,2015

4. ‘Evidencing Domestic Violence, Including Behaviour that Falls Under the New Offence of “Controlling or Coercive Behaviour”’;International Journal of Evidence and Proof,2018

5. ‘A Review of Domestic Violence Arrest Statistics in Police Department Using a Pro-Arrest Policy: Are Pro-Arrest Policies Enough?’;Bourg;Journal of Family Violence,1994

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3