Extending the Procedural Justice Theory to the Chinese Context: The Role of Collective Efficacy

Author:

Wu Guangzhen1,Liu Jianhong2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Sociology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

2. Faculty of Law, University of Macau, E32-3005, Avenida da Universidade, Taipa, Macau, China

Abstract

Abstract Recognizing that prior research has paid limited attention to the relevance of neighbourhood context to the procedural justice model of regulation, this study, based on data collected from a recent survey of 2,245 residents in a southeast city in China, examined the relationship between procedural fairness, collective efficacy and citizens’ willingness to cooperate with the police, with a special focus on the role of collective efficacy in the function of the procedural justice theoretical framework. The results of this study revealed that the association between perceived collective efficacy and willingness to cooperate with the police was stronger than that between procedural fairness and the outcome variable. Additionally, this study demonstrated a moderating role of perceived collective efficacy on the relationship between procedural fairness and cooperation (the link between procedural fairness and cooperation was stronger for those with a low level of perceived collective efficacy), further highlighting the relevance of citizens’ perceptions of neighbourhood context to their attitudinal behaviours towards the police. These findings have important implications for the direction of efforts to foster citizens’ support and cooperation.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Law,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Social Psychology,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference43 articles.

1. ‘Policing and Social Identity: Procedural Justice, Inclusion and Cooperation Between Police and Public’,;Bradford;Policing and Society,2014

2. Obeying the Rules of the Road: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Normative Compliance’,;Bradford;Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice,2015

3. Legitimacy and the Social Field of Policing’;Bradford,2011

4. Police Legitimacy in Action: Lessons for Theory and Practice’,;Bradford,2014

5. ‘Policing in the People’s Republic of China: a review of recent literature’;Dai;Crime, Law and Social Change,2008

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3