Affiliation:
1. Department of International Development, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
Abstract
Abstract
Despite its importance for poverty reduction, the poor face barriers when accessing justice. However, the literature, looking mostly at developed countries, focuses on the institutional underpinnings of these restrictions, and thus ignores social structural barriers. This paper deals with one type of social barrier; clientelism and its impact on poor clients’ access to justice. I argue that asymmetric power distribution enables patrons to bar clients from accessing formal institutions. Such barriers can’t be rectified through institutional reforms. Making use of an original dataset from Pakistan this paper recommends an unorthodox policy solution; increasing connectivity. I demonstrate how exit options, brought about through connectivity, alter bargaining powers, thereby limiting patrons’ ability to block clients from accessing formal justice institutions.
Funder
Leverhulme Early Career Fellowship
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Law,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Social Psychology,Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Reference35 articles.
1. ‘Kinship in West Punjab Villages’,;Alavi;Contribution to Indian Sociology,1972
2. ‘The Logic of Clientelism in Argentina: An Ethnographic Account’,;Auyero;Latin American Research Review,2000
3. ‘“Did You Call the Police? What Did They Do?” An Empirical Assessment of Black’s Theory of Mobilization of Law’,;Avakame;Justice Quarterly,1999
4. ‘Legal Empowerment as a Conceptual and Operational Tool in Poverty Eradication’,;Banik;Hague Journal on the Rule Law,2009
5. ‘One Kind of Power’,;Basu;Oxford Economic Papers,1986
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献