A qualitative interview study among clinicians managing trauma patients: identifying barriers and potential solutions to improving a trauma registry in a lower-to-middle-income country

Author:

Mohammed Zeinab12,Saleh Yaseen34ORCID,AbdelSalam Eman Mohammed5,El-Bana Emad6,El-Morsy El-Morsy Ahmed1,Senosy Shaimaa1,Hirshon Jon Mark27

Affiliation:

1. Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Beni-Suef University , Beni-Suef 62521, Egypt

2. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore, MD 21201, USA

3. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Miami Health System , Miami, FL 33136, USA

4. Department of Emergency Medicine, Jackson Memorial Hospital , Miami, FL 33136, USA

5. Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Beni-Suef University , Beni-Suef 62521, Egypt

6. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Beni-Suef University , Beni-Suef 62521, Egypt

7. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore, MD 21201, USA

Abstract

Abstract Background The ability to adapt clinical management of trauma in many lower- and middle- income countries (LMICs) has been historically constrained by nonexistent or inadequate data registries. These registries suffer from a variety of issues including administrative, logistical, educational, feasibility, and financial barriers. Objective The present study aimed to survey physicians at a representative hospital with documented trauma record deficiencies regarding their experiences with the current registry system, barriers that affect the current system, and recommendations for improvement. Methods This study was a qualitative analysis of the experiences and opinions of trauma physicians in the Emergency Department of Beni-Suef University Hospital. Eight participants underwent a semi-structured interview covering the aforementioned topics. The interviews were then coded to identify prominent themes, from which quotes that epitomized these themes were selected. Results The participants identified issues with the current data registry system that corroborates prior quantitative data at the location, particularly stressing the lack of critical information affecting patient care and safety including mechanisms of injury, patient identification information, and time courses. Clinical duties and staffing were identified as primary barriers as the large patient volume seen in under-resourced hospitals precludes the ability of the physician to adequately complete documentation. Simplicity and practical workflow modification in conjunction with increased data utilization in the form of research output were stressed as desirable features that could facilitate the improvement of the current system. Conclusion Data registries enable hospitals and public health systems to engage in primary and secondary interventions, thereby reducing clinical volume loads and increasing clinical efficacy. After engaging in constructive discussion with physicians on the trauma care team at Beni-Suef University Hospital, the goal of workflow modification within existing resources was established as the primary guiding principle for subsequent interventional stages in improving the current trauma registry.

Funder

the National Institutes of Health, Fogarty International Center

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3