Clinical evaluation of BioFire® multiplex-PCR panel for acute undifferentiated febrile illnesses in travellers: a prospective multicentre study
Author:
Camprubí-Ferrer Daniel1, Cobuccio Ludovico2, Van Den Broucke Steven3, Balerdi-Sarasola Leire1, Genton Blaise2, Bottieau Emmanuel3, Navero-Castillejos Jessica4, Martinez Miguel J4, Jay Corinne5, Grange Anne5, Borland Stéphanie5, Vaughn Mike6, Rodriguez-Valero Natalia1, Almuedo-Riera Alex1, D’Acremont Valérie2, Subirà Carme1, de Alba Tessa1, Cruz Angeline1, Van Esbroeck Marjan3, Smith Crystal6, Hillman Ashley6, Hanberg Brandon6, Trauscht Rob6, Spampanato Nerissa6, Muñoz Jose1
Affiliation:
1. ISGlobal, Hospital Clínic—Universitat de Barcelona , Barcelona, Spain 2. Center for Primary Care and Public Health, University of Lausanne , Lausanne, Switzerland 3. Institute of Tropical Medicine Department of Clinical Sciences, , Antwerp, Belgium 4. Hospital Clínic Barcelona Microbiology Department, , Barcelona, Spain 5. bioMérieux, Centre Christophe Mérieux, Parc PolyTec , Grenoble, France 6. BioFire Diagnostics, LLC, bioMérieux Company , Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Identifying the causes of Acute Undifferentiated Febrile Illness (AUFI) is key to improve the management of returning travellers with fever. We evaluated a BioFire®FilmArray® prototype panel of multiplex nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) targeting different relevant pathogens in travellers returning with fever.
Methods
Prospective, multicentre study to evaluate a prototype panel in whole blood samples of adult international travellers presenting with AUFI in three European travel Clinics/Hospitals (November 2017–November 2019). We evaluated 15 target analytes: Plasmodium spp., Plasmodium falciparum, Plasmodium knowlesi, Plasmodium malariae, Plasmodium ovale, Plasmodium vivax, chikungunya virus, dengue virus, Zika virus, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Borrelia spp., Leptospira spp., Orientia tsutsugamushi, Rickettsia spp. and Salmonella spp. Results were compared with composite reference standards (CRSs) for each target infection, including direct methods [smear microscopy, rapid diagnostic test (RDT), reference NAAT and blood cultures] and indirect methods (paired serology).
Findings
Among 455 travellers with AUFI, 229 target infections were diagnosed; the prototype panel detected 143 (overall sensitivity and specificity of 62.5 and 99.8%, respectively). The panel identified all Plasmodium infections (n = 82). Sensitivity for dengue (n = 71) was 92.9, 80.8 and 68.5% compared with RDT, NAAT and CRS, respectively. Compared with direct methods and CRS, respectively, the prototype panel detected 4/4 and 4/6 chikungunya, 2/2 and 4/29 Leptospira spp., 1/1 and 1/6 O. tsutsugamushi and 2/2 and 2/55 Rickettsia spp., but 0/2 and 0/10 Zika, 0/1 and 0/11 A. phagocytophylum and 0/3 Borrelia spp. diagnosed by serology and only 1/7 Salmonella spp. diagnosed by blood cultures. 77/86 (89.5%) infections not detected by the panel were diagnosed by serology.
Interpretation
The prototype panel allowed rapid and reliable diagnosis for malaria, dengue and chikungunya. Further improvements are needed to improve its sensitivity for Zika and important travel-related bacterial infections.
Funder
BioFire Diagnostics Research Award Grant from the International Society of Travel Medicine
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|