Affiliation:
1. Department of English, City University of Hong Kong
Abstract
Abstract
This essay examines Thomas Pynchon’s 2009 Inherent Vice and Paul Thomas Anderson’s 2014 adaptation of the novel. These works are closely connected, and can be effectively viewed as two parts of a single transmedia text which includes a novel, a film, and two trailers. All of the constituent parts of this meta-Inherent Vice are informed by their engagement with nostalgia. Yet it is precisely here that the texts diverge from each other most markedly, activating different types of nostalgia for different purposes. While much contemporary scholarship relies on Svetlana Boym’s reflective/restorative binary to conceptualize the phenomenon of nostalgia, this reading argues that a public/personal divide offers another perhaps more appropriate lens to view the differences between the two versions of Inherent Vice. Pynchon’s novel emphasizes the political potential and social aspects of nostalgia, while Anderson’s film focuses on its personal, affective impact.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Visual Arts and Performing Arts
Reference65 articles.
1. “Walked out of Inherent Vice. Understood so little of plot or dialogue, I worried I ‘d had a stroke.”;@PhilipHensher;Twitter,1 . 2015
2. “Pynchon’s Twenty-First-Century Paratexts.”;Andersen,2019
3. Introduction: ‘Medical Dissertation on Nostalgia by Johannes Hofer, 1688’.”;Anspach;Bulletin of the Institute of the History of Medicine,1934
4. “From Hard Boiled to Over Easy: Reimagining the Noir Detective in Inherent Vice and Bleeding Edge.”;Backman,2018
5. Paratext and Digitized Narrative: Mapping the Field.”;Birke;Narrative,2013