Trophic Ecology Drives Annual Variation in Abundance of Aphidophagous (Coccinellidae, Coleoptera and Chrysopidae, Neuroptera) and Phytophagous (Noctuidae, Lepidoptera) Insects: Evidence From Light Traps

Author:

Honěk Alois1ORCID,Novák Ivo2,Martinková Zdenka1,Saska Pavel1ORCID,Kulfan Ján3,Holecová Milada4,Jauschová Terézia3,Zach Peter3

Affiliation:

1. Crop Research Institute , Drnovská 507, 16106 Praha 6 – Ruzyně , Czech Republic

2. Masarykova 882, 25263 Roztoky, Czech Republic

3. Institute of Forest Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences , Ľ. Štúra 2, 96053 Zvolen , Slovakia

4. Department of Zoology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University , Mlynská dolina, Ilkovičova 6, 84215 Bratislava , Slovakia

Abstract

Abstract Using seventeen-year records of daily light trap catches of predatory Neuroptera (Chrysopidae, 13 species) and Coleoptera (Coccinellidae, 10 species), and of phytophagous Lepidoptera (Noctuidae, 79 species) we tested a hypothesis predicting that the range of annual fluctuations of catch size is greater in aphidophages, whose diet occurs irregularly and locally, than in phytophages, whose diet is available regularly and abundantly. The ranges of fluctuations of annual catches measured as the coefficient of variance (standard deviation expressed as a percentage of the average) of detrended annual catches were significantly greater in Chrysopidae (84 ± 7.1%) and Coccinellidae (121 ± 14.0%) than in Noctuidae (66 ± 2.6%). The difference between aphidophages and phytophages remained when we tested differences between the former and the samples of Noctuidae consisting only of those species whose characteristics (abundance, length and timing of flight period, number of generations per season, overwintering stage) were the same as in aphidophages. Similarly, no differences were found between sets of Noctuidae species that have characteristics (abundance, voltinism, period of flight activity) similar to aphidophages and sets of Noctuidae species that have contrary characteristics. Flight abilities of aphidophages are smaller than those of Noctuidae. As a result of this difference a light trap collects populations of aphidophages from a smaller area than populations of Noctuidae. Thus the extent of fluctuations of catch size of aphidophagous and phytophagous species is influenced both by annual differences in food availability and by differences in size of the area from which the individuals assembling to the light source are recruited.

Funder

Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Insect Science

Reference66 articles.

1. An analysis of captures of Hemerobiidae and Chrysopidae in suction traps at Rothamsted, July 1949.;Banks;Proc. R. Soc. Lond. (A),1952

2. Diet breadth of the aphid predator Chrysoperla rufilabris Burmeister (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) Bull;Batista;Entomol. Res,2022

3. Flight potential of feral Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) males measured with a 32-chanel, computer monitored, flight mill system;Beerwinkle;Environ. Entomol,1995

4. Migration of Corixidae (Heteroptera) based on light trap data;Benedek;Acta Zool. Acad. Sci. Hung,1973

5. Insect catches in a blended and a black light trap in northern Finland;Blomberg;Oikos,1976

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3