Initial development of an ‘Orthodontic Care Index’ involving treatment need,—complexity and—priority

Author:

De Ridder Lutgart1,Decreus Julie1,Willems Guy1,Cadenas de Llano-Pérula Maria1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Oral Health Sciences-Orthodontics, KU Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7, Blok 1 , Bus 7001, 3000 Leuven , Belgium

Abstract

Abstract Background/Objectives The aim of this study was to develop an evidence-based scoring system for prioritizing limited orthodontic resources based on orthodontic treatment need (OTN), orthodontic treatment complexity (OTC), and orthodontic treatment priority (OTP), which is not merely a scoring system for malocclusion but also a comprehensive classification of orthodontic issues incorporating patient- and treatment-related factors, called Orthodontic Care Index (OCI). Materials and methods The development of the OCI involved eight phases, starting with a systematic literature review to identify all possible parameters involved in determining OTN, OTC, and OTP. An eight-member orthodontic specialist panel then evaluated and scored the significance of each parameter, resulting in a parameter-score list. Subsequently, a retrospective convenience sample of 61 patients was scored with the parameter-score list, and using the same convenience sample a gold standard was established through the expert opinion of a third orthodontic panel. Linear regression analysis was used to estimate weights of importance and construct a formula to calculate index scores. Lastly, the expert opinion was compared to the index scores, to determine the index performance. Results The preliminary index separately calculates OTN, OTC, and OTP for a patient as the weighted sum of his/her domain scores. The sensitivity of the index for predicting OTN, OTC, and OTP was high (98.1%, 82.9%, and 92.7% respectively), while the variability of each was relatively low (52.1%, 31.2%, and 52.6% respectively). Conclusions/Implications The OCI shows promise as a guideline for prioritizing orthodontic care. It will be further refined and validated to enhance its performance and usefulness.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference39 articles.

1. American Association of orthodontics, adults are seeking orthodontic treatment in record numbers,2016

2. Indexes for orthodontic treatment need commentary;Järvinen;Am J Orthodont Dentofacial Orthoped,2001

3. A 2-center comparison of orthodontist’s perceptions of orthodontic treatment difficulty;Richmond,2001

4. An index of orthodontic treatment complexity;Llewellyn,2007

5. The ABO discrepancy index: a measure of case complexity;Cangialosi;Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2004

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3