Affiliation:
1. Graduate Program in Dentistry, Dental School, Federal University of Pará, UFPA – Belém , Pará , Brazil
2. School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton , Alberta , Canada
3. Department of Orthodontics, Dental School, Federal University of Pará, UFPA – Belém , Pará , Brazil
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Orthodontic retainers are widely used to prevent relapses after orthodontic treatment; however, evidence about patients' perceptions of retainers is lacking.
Objective
To assess patients’ perception of orthodontic retainers.
Search Methods
PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, LILACS, LIVIVO, Cochrane Library, and gray literature (Google Scholar) were searched without date or language restrictions. A manual search of the reference lists of the included articles was also performed.
Selection criteria
Studies comparing patients’ perceptions of wearing orthodontic retainers were included.
Data collection and analysis
According to the study design, the risk of bias (RoB) assessment was performed using RoB 2.0 or ROBINS-I. The level of evidence was assessed through the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) tool.
Results
Seventeen studies met the eligibility criteria. After the RoB assessment, 12 randomized controlled trials presented a high RoB, and 4 non-randomized controlled trials presented a moderate RoB. The certainty of evidence was classified as very low for the four assessed outcomes. The studies generally reported an initial temporary negative impact of orthodontic retainers. Different esthetic, functional, and ease-of-use advantages are reported using removable and fixed retainers. A quantitative analysis was not performed due to the considerable clinical and methodological heterogeneity among the studies.
Conclusion
The current evidence, although very limited, suggests that orthodontic retainers have an initial negative impact related to discomfort and functional limitations, but they seem to regress over time. There is a preference for thermoplastic over Hawley-type retainers. However, thermoplastic retainers cause different functional difficulties, and bonded retainers present the advantage of affecting speech function less than orthodontic removable retainers, although they can facilitate oral hygiene problems.
Registration
PROSPERO (CRD42022306665).
Funder
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference44 articles.
1. Factors associated with stability: a retrospective study of 209 patients;Maia;World J Orthod,2010
2. Retention procedures for stabilising tooth position after treatment with orthodontic braces;Martin,2023
3. Results of a survey-based study to identify common retention practices in the United States;Valiathan,2010
4. Bonded versus vacuum-formed retainers: a randomized controlled trial Part 1: stability, retainer survival, and patient satisfaction outcomes after 12 months;Forde,2018
5. Caries and periodontal reactions associated with long-term use of different types of bonded lingual retainers;Artun,1984