Patients’ perception of orthodontic retainers: a systematic review

Author:

Moda Larissa Barbosa1ORCID,Bastos Renata Travassos da Rosa Moreira1,Flores-Mir Carlos2ORCID,Normando David3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Graduate Program in Dentistry, Dental School, Federal University of Pará, UFPA – Belém , Pará , Brazil

2. School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton , Alberta , Canada

3. Department of Orthodontics, Dental School, Federal University of Pará, UFPA – Belém , Pará , Brazil

Abstract

Abstract Background Orthodontic retainers are widely used to prevent relapses after orthodontic treatment; however, evidence about patients' perceptions of retainers is lacking. Objective To assess patients’ perception of orthodontic retainers. Search Methods PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, LILACS, LIVIVO, Cochrane Library, and gray literature (Google Scholar) were searched without date or language restrictions. A manual search of the reference lists of the included articles was also performed. Selection criteria Studies comparing patients’ perceptions of wearing orthodontic retainers were included. Data collection and analysis According to the study design, the risk of bias (RoB) assessment was performed using RoB 2.0 or ROBINS-I. The level of evidence was assessed through the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) tool. Results Seventeen studies met the eligibility criteria. After the RoB assessment, 12 randomized controlled trials presented a high RoB, and 4 non-randomized controlled trials presented a moderate RoB. The certainty of evidence was classified as very low for the four assessed outcomes. The studies generally reported an initial temporary negative impact of orthodontic retainers. Different esthetic, functional, and ease-of-use advantages are reported using removable and fixed retainers. A quantitative analysis was not performed due to the considerable clinical and methodological heterogeneity among the studies. Conclusion The current evidence, although very limited, suggests that orthodontic retainers have an initial negative impact related to discomfort and functional limitations, but they seem to regress over time. There is a preference for thermoplastic over Hawley-type retainers. However, thermoplastic retainers cause different functional difficulties, and bonded retainers present the advantage of affecting speech function less than orthodontic removable retainers, although they can facilitate oral hygiene problems. Registration PROSPERO (CRD42022306665).

Funder

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Orthodontics

Reference44 articles.

1. Factors associated with stability: a retrospective study of 209 patients;Maia;World J Orthod,2010

2. Retention procedures for stabilising tooth position after treatment with orthodontic braces;Martin,2023

3. Results of a survey-based study to identify common retention practices in the United States;Valiathan,2010

4. Bonded versus vacuum-formed retainers: a randomized controlled trial Part 1: stability, retainer survival, and patient satisfaction outcomes after 12 months;Forde,2018

5. Caries and periodontal reactions associated with long-term use of different types of bonded lingual retainers;Artun,1984

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3