Affiliation:
1. Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens , Athens , Greece
2. Private Practice , Athens , Greece
Abstract
Summary
Objectives
The purpose of this study was to measure the effectiveness of the cervical headgear for distalizing first permanent maxillary molars in relation to hours of use.
Methods
This was a one-centre, prospective, clinical study conducted at the Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece. Participants (N = 26; 17 females, 9 males) were patients with no history of orthodontic treatment, no syndromes or clefts, and Angle’s Class II malocclusion, where the treatment plan included a cervical headgear. They were instructed to wear the appliance for at least 12 h per day. A TheraMon® microsensor was embedded in the headgear’s strap to objectively measure wear-time. To measure tooth movement, pre- and post-treatment digital models were superimposed, using the palate as a reference area; translation and rotation were measured along three axes. Superimposition and movement measurements were made with the Viewbox 4 software.
Results
Average treatment time and headgear wear were 130 days and 55 days, respectively, i.e. 10.1 h/day. During this period, distal movement averaged 1.75 mm with high variability (min 0.2 mm, max 4.5 mm). Distal tipping and rotation had an average of approximately 5 °C. Cumulative headgear wear was significantly correlated with distal movement (r2 = 0.32, P < .002), distal tipping (r2 = 0.27, P < .01), and distal rotation around the long axis of the tooth (r2 = 0.20, P < .05).
Conclusion
Compliance is critical for having a successful clinical outcome. Distalization of the molar with a cervical headgear is correlated with the cumulative hours of appliance use, with hours per day being a weaker predictor.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference57 articles.
1. The role of the headgear in growth modification;Nanda,2006
2. The biologic basis of orthodontic therapy;Proffit,2019
3. Cervical extraoral traction therapy in early treatment of class II malocclusion A systematic review;Yepes,2019
4. Patient cooperation in wearing orthodontic headgear;Clemmer,1979
5. Prediction of cooperation in orthodontic treatment;Nanda,1992