Periodontal outcomes associated with impacted maxillary central incisor and canine teeth following surgical exposure and orthodontic alignment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Seehra Jadbinder12ORCID,Alshammari Aminah2,Wazwaz Fidaa1,Papageorgiou Spyridon N3ORCID,Newton Jonathon T4,Cobourne Martyn T12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Craniofacial Development & Regeneration, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King’s College London, Guy’s Hospital , Floor 27, London SE1 9RT , United Kingdom

2. Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King’s College London, Floor 21, Guy’s Hospital, Guy’s and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust , London SE1 9RT , United Kingdom

3. Clinic of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich , Plattenstrasse 11, Zurich 8032 , Switzerland

4. Population & Patient Health, Guy’s Hospital , Floor 18, Tower Wing, London SE1 9RT , United Kingdom

Abstract

Abstract Background Maxillary incisor and canine teeth are commonly impacted and require multidisciplinary treatment to accommodate them in the dental arch. Objectives To assess the periodontal outcomes of impacted maxillary central incisor and canine teeth, which have been successfully aligned in the arch following surgical exposure and orthodontic traction with fixed appliance therapy. Search methods Systematic literature searches without restrictions were undertaken in eight databases. Selection criteria Studies reporting surgical interventions in combination with orthodontic traction with fixed appliance therapy to align impacted maxillary incisors or canines published up to January 2023. Data collection Duplicate independent study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Analysis Random-effects meta-analyses of aggregate data. Results Twenty-three studies (21 retrospective and 2 prospective) were included in the final analysis. Three studies reported outcomes for maxillary central incisors and 20 reported outcomes for maxillary canines. For maxillary central incisors, all three studies were rated as being at moderate risk of bias. For maxillary canines, 17 studies and 1 study were rated at moderate and high risk of bias, respectively. Both prospective studies were rated at a low risk of bias. Meta-analyses comparing aligned impacted maxillary canines to their non-impacted contralateral counterparts found the former had increased Plaque Index scores (mean difference [MD] 0.19; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.03, 0.35; P = 0.03), increased clinical attachment loss (MD 0.40 mm; 95% CI 0.17, 0.63; P = 0.01), increased pocket probing depth (MD 0.18 mm; 95% CI 0.07, 0.28; P = 0.001), increased bone loss (MD 0.51 mm; 95% CI 0.31, 0.72; P < 0.001), and reduced keratinized gingival width (MD −0.31 mm; 95% CI −0.61, −0.01; P = 0.04). Conclusions Limited evidence suggests that surgical exposure and orthodontic alignment of impacted maxillary central incisor or canine teeth, results in modest adverse effects in the periodontium. These findings should be viewed with caution as our certainty for these outcomes is very low to low due to the bias and heterogeneity. Further well-conducted studies reporting patient centred outcomes are required. Registration PROSPERO (CRD42020225639)

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Orthodontics

Reference66 articles.

1. The incidence of unerupted permanent teeth and related clinical cases;Grover,1985

2. Dental anomalies: prevalence and associations between them in a large sample of non-orthodontic subjects, a cross-sectional study;Lagana,2017

3. National clinical guidelines for the management of unerupted maxillary incisors in children;Seehra,2018

4. Posttreatment assessment of surgically exposed and orthodontically aligned impacted maxillary canines;Blair,1998

5. Early treatment of palatally erupting maxillary canines by extraction of the primary canines;Ericson,1988

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3