Affiliation:
1. Harvard University , USA
2. London School of Economics , UK
3. Columbia Business School , USA
Abstract
Abstract
An influential emerging literature documents strong correlations between carbon emissions and stock returns. We re-examine those data and conclude that these associations are driven by two factors. First, stock returns are correlated only with unscaled emissions estimated by the data vendor, but not with unscaled emissions actually disclosed by firms. Vendor-estimated emissions systematically differ from firm-disclosed emissions and are highly correlated with financial fundamentals, suggesting that prior findings primarily capture the association between such fundamentals and returns. Second, unscaled emissions, the variable typically used in academic literature, is correlated with stock returns but emissions intensity (emissions scaled by firm size), an equally important measure used in practice, is not. While unscaled emissions represent an important metric for society, we argue that, for individual firms, emissions intensity is an appropriate measurement choice to assess carbon performance. The associations between emissions and returns disappear after accounting for either of the issues above.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Finance,Economics and Econometrics,Accounting
Reference20 articles.
1. Hedging climate risk;Andersson;Financial Analysts Journal,2016
2. What’s my line? A comparison of industry classification schemes for capital market research;Bhojraj;Journal of Accounting Research,2003
3. Do investors care about carbon risk?;Bolton;Journal of Financial Economics,2021
4. Global pricing of carbon-transition risk;Bolton;Journal of Finance,2022
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献