Advancing Readiness Through Military Programs: An Evidence-Based Practice Perspective

Author:

Hefley Justin1,Talbot Laura A2,Metter E. Jeffrey2,Lorenz Megan E3,Shattuck Heather1,Romito Kenneth1,Heyne Rebecca E4,Bradley David F1

Affiliation:

1. Graduate School of Nursing, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences , Bethesda, MD 20814, USA

2. Department of Neurology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, College of Medicine , Memphis, TN 38163, USA

3. Landstuhl Regional Medical Center, Unit 33100, APO , Landstuhl 66849, Germany

4. Lackland Airforce Base, Science and Technology, Center for Clinical Inquiry , JBSA Lackland, TX 78236, USA

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Military nurses comprise the largest percentage of military health care providers. In the current military health care system, they have two roles: (1) Patient care in military treatment facilities (MTFs) and (2) patient care during combat operations. Although in MTFs, the military nurse’s roles are similar to those of their civilian counterpart, their roles are unique and varied in the combat operational environment. These combined roles lead to questions regarding readiness training to ensure that nurses are proficient in both MTFs and combat operational settings where treatment requirements may differ. The purpose of this paper is to (1) present the current state of educational readiness programs to maintain a ready medical force that entail formal teaching programs, military–civilian partnerships, and joint exercises of combat simulations, and (2) identify gaps as presented in an evidence-based practice educational panel. Methods On March 11, 2022, TriService Nursing Research Program hosted the virtual First Military Evidence-Based Practice Summit from the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences in Bethesda, MD. As part of the summit, an evidence-based practice education panel discussed the availability of current evidence-driven military medical readiness programs and identified gaps in the integration of military readiness for nursing personnel into the Defense Health Agency and Armed Services. Results The panel participants discussed the separate requirements for training within the MTFs and in combat operational settings. The available training programs identified by the panel were primarily those developed in local MTF settings to meet local needs. Although these programs support the MTFs’ peacetime mission, competing roles, limited time, and limited funds contributed to limited preparation of nursing personnel in skills associated with combat-related injuries and illnesses. Prolonged casualty care has become an important focus for the Department of Defense as greater considerations are directed to wartime operations in austere expeditionary environments. Although there is some training available that is specific for prolonged casualty care, the focus has been the adaptation of combat casualty care during contingency operations. A keynote here was the concept that combat casualty care training must include both development of individual skills and integration of the team since maximal care can be achieved only when the individual and the team operate as a unit. A key point was the utility of central repositories for storing information related to training a ready medical force at individual and unit levels and that these repositories could also be used to collect and facilitate the accession of current evidence-based information. Discussion Optimal patient care at all levels of the military health system requires training that maximizes individual and unit skills specific to the environment at an MTF or in a combat operational setting. Training must be designed to incorporate evidence-driven knowledge in all military settings with guidance that is specific to the environment. Conclusion Enhanced communication of evidence-based training and knowledge is an important component of maintaining a ready medical force for broader medical support of combat contingency operations.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Medicine

Reference28 articles.

1. COVID-19: military nurses leading innovation through research, clinical care, education, and collaboration;King;Mil Med,2021

2. Summary of the 2018 National Defense Strategy;Department of Defense,2018

3. Report to the Congressional Armed Services Committees Section 719 of the National Defense Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (PUBLIC LAW 116–92);Department of Defense,2021

4. 2022 National Defense Strategy;Department of Defense,2022

5. Preparing for the Future of Combat Casualty Care: Opportunities to Refine the Military Health System’s Alignment with the National Defense Strategy;Thomas,2021

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3