Changes in Elective and Urgent Surgery Among TRICARE Beneficiaries During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author:

Crawford Alexander M1,Lightsey IV Harry M1,Xiong Grace X1,Ye Jamie2,Call Catherine M3,Pomer Alysa2,Cooper Zara2,Simpson Andrew K1,Koehlmoos Tracey P4,Weissman Joel S2,Schoenfeld Andrew J5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA 02115, USA

2. Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA 02115, USA

3. Tufts University School of Medicine , Boston, MA 02111, USA

4. Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences , Bethesda, MD 20814, USA

5. Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA 02115, USA

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background COVID-19 is known to have altered the capacity to perform surgical procedures in numerous health care settings. The impact of this change within the direct and private-sector settings of the Military Health System has not been effectively explored, particularly as it pertains to disparities in surgical access and shifting of services between sectors. We sought to characterize how the COVID-19 pandemic influenced access to care for surgical procedures within the direct and private-sector settings of the Military Health System. Methods We retrospectively evaluated claims for patients receiving urgent and elective surgical procedures in March–September 2017, 2019, and 2020. The pre-COVID period consisted of 2017 and 2019 and was compared to 2020. We adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics, medical comorbidities, and region of care using multivariable Poisson regression. Subanalyses considered the impact of race and sponsor rank as a proxy for socioeconomic status. Results During the period of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was no significant difference in the adjusted rate of urgent surgical procedures in direct (risk ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.97–1.03) or private-sector (risk ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.97–1.02) care. This was also true for elective surgeries in both settings. No significant disparities were identified in any of the racial subgroups or proxies for socioeconomic status we considered in direct or private-sector care. Conclusions We found a similar performance of elective and urgent surgeries in both the private sector and direct care during the first 6 months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Importantly, no racial disparities were identified in either care setting.

Funder

Defense Health Agency

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3