The Military Medicine Leadership Life Cycle: A Model for Longitudinal Leadership Development in Medicine—Undergraduate and Graduate Medical Education

Author:

Barry Erin S123ORCID,Hartzell Joshua D3,Durning Steven J3,Yarnell Angela M2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesiology, F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University , Bethesda, MD 20814, USA

2. Department of Military & Emergency Medicine, F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University , Bethesda, MD 20814, USA

3. Department of Health Professions Education, F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University , Bethesda, MD 20814, USA

Abstract

ABSTRACT Physicians must be leaders more than ever with innumerable challenges. Despite this need, there is a paucity of consistent leadership development (LD) from medical student to staff physician. Military medicine has additional challenges—working within a large health care organization, constant turnover, working in a variety of contexts—that make the need for LD even more pressing. The purpose of this paper is to describe the LD life cycle for military undergraduate and graduate medical education (UME and GME), providing examples for other organizations while identifying steps to meet the future needs in military medicine. The Health Professions Scholarship Program produces over 75% of graduates for military medicine each year. Yet, since learners are dispersed throughout civilian medical schools any LD results in a heterogeneous experience. Uniformed Services University has a 4-year LD program required for all students as well as other opportunities for leadership professional growth. Military GME programs are unique, requiring a military unique curriculum to prepare graduates for their initial assignments. Military unique curriculum vary, but include clinical topics relevant to military medicine as well as leadership. There is no Military Healthcare System-wide leadership curriculum used by everyone at this time. Based on these UME and GME approaches to LD, there have been multiple lessons learned formed on the authors experience and published literature: learners do not typically see themselves as leaders; learners want applicable curriculum with less lecturing and more application and discussion; programs are often siloed from one another and sharing curriculum content does not typically occur; no one-size-fits-all model. On the basis of the lessons learned and the current state of UME and GME leadership education, there are 5 recommendations to enhance UME and GME leadership programs: (1) develop a Health Professions Scholarship Program Leadership Curriculum; (2) develop a MHS GME Leadership Curriculum; (3) integrate UME and GME Leadership Curricula; (4) develop faculty to teach leadership; and (5) conduct research on UME and GME in military and share lessons learned. We suggest a roadmap for strengthening LD within military medicine and civilian institutions.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference16 articles.

1. A faculty development model for academic leadership education across a health care organization;Servey;J Med Educ Curric Dev,2020

2. Strong reasons make strong actions: closing the leadership gap in the army medical corps;Sullivan;Mil Rev,2020

3. A comparison of HPSP and USU graduates’ preparation for residency;Cole;Milit Med,2023

4. Department of Military and Emergency Medicine: Education;Uniformed Services University

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3