Affiliation:
1. Department of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Science, Arkansas Tech University , Russellville, AR 72801, USA
2. Department of Kinesiology and Nutritional Sciences, University of Nevada , Las Vegas, NV 89154-3034, USA
3. The Ohio State University, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University , Columbus, OH 43214, USA
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Military tactical athletes face the unique task of performing physically demanding occupational duties, often while wearing body armor. Forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume measured using spirometry have been shown to decrease, while wearing plate-carrier style body armor, little is known about the comprehensive effects of wearing body armor on pulmonary function, including lung capacities. Further, the effects of loaded body armor vs. unloaded on pulmonary function are also unknown. Therefore, this study examined how loaded and unloaded body armor affects pulmonary function. Twelve college-aged males performed spirometry and plethysmography under three conditions (basic athletic attire [CNTL], unloaded plate carrier [UNL], and loaded plate carrier [LOAD]). Compared to CNTL, LOAD and UNL conditions significantly reduced functional residual capacity by 14% and 17%, respectively. Compared with CNTL, LOAD condition also showed a small but statistically significant lowered forced vital capacity (P = .02, d = 0.3), a 6% lower total lung capacity (P < .01, d = 0.5), and lowered maximal voluntary ventilation (P = .04, d = 0.4). A loaded plate-carrier style body armor exerts a restrictive effect on total lung capacity, and both loaded and unloaded body armor affects functional residual capacity, which could impact breathing mechanics during exercise. Resulting endurance performance decreases may need to be factored based on the style and loading of body armor, especially for longer-duration operations.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Medicine