United States Military Fatalities During Operation Inherent Resolve and Operation Freedom’s Sentinel

Author:

Kotwal Russ S12,Janak Jud C1,Howard Jeffrey T13,Rohrer Andrew J124,Harcke Howard T24,Holcomb John B5,Eastridge Brian J6,Gurney Jennifer M127,Shackelford Stacy A12,Mazuchowski Edward L1248

Affiliation:

1. Joint Trauma System, Defense Health Agency, Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234, USA

2. Department of Military and Emergency Medicine (Kotwal), Department of Pathology (Rohrer, Mazuchowski), Department of Radiology (Harcke), Department of Surgery (Gurney, Shackelford), Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA

3. Department of Public Health, College for Health Community and Policy, One UTSA Circle, University of Texas, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA

4. Armed Forces Medical Examiner System, Defense Health Agency, Dover Air Force Base, DE 19902, USA

5. Department of Surgery, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA

6. Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA

7. Burn Center and Research Directorate, United States Army Institute of Surgical Research, Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234, USA

8. Forensic Pathology Associates, HNL Lab Medicine, Allentown, PA 18109, USA

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackgroundMilitary operations provide a unified action and strategic approach to achieve national goals and objectives. Mortality reviews from military operations can guide injury prevention and casualty care efforts.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted on all U.S. military fatalities from Operation Inherent Resolve (OIR) in Iraq (2014-2021) and Operation Freedom’s Sentinel (OFS) in Afghanistan (2015-2021). Data were obtained from autopsy reports and other existing records. Fatalities were evaluated for population characteristics; manner, cause, and location of death; and underlying atherosclerosis. Non-suicide trauma fatalities were also evaluated for injury severity, mechanism of death, injury survivability, death preventability, and opportunities for improvement.ResultsOf 213 U.S. military fatalities (median age, 29 years; male, 93.0%; prehospital, 89.2%), 49.8% were from OIR, and 50.2% were from OFS. More OIR fatalities were Reserve and National Guard forces (OIR 22.6%; OFS 5.6%), conventional forces (OIR 82.1%; OFS 65.4%), and support personnel (OIR 61.3%; OFS 33.6%). More OIR fatalities also resulted from disease and non-battle injury (OIR 83.0%; OFS 28.0%). The leading cause of death was injury (OIR 81.1%; OFS 98.1%). Manner of death differed as more homicides (OIR 18.9%; OFS 72.9%) were seen in OFS, and more deaths from natural causes (OIR 18.9%; OFS 1.9%) and suicides (OIR 29.2%; OFS 6.5%) were seen in OIR. The prevalence of underlying atherosclerosis was 14.2% in OIR and 18.7% in OFS. Of 146 non-suicide trauma fatalities, most multiple/blunt force injury deaths (62.2%) occurred in OIR, and most blast injury deaths (77.8%) and gunshot wound deaths (76.6%) occurred in OFS. The leading mechanism of death was catastrophic tissue destruction (80.8%). Most fatalities had non-survivable injuries (80.8%) and non-preventable deaths (97.3%).ConclusionsComprehensive mortality reviews should routinely be conducted for all military operation deaths. Understanding death from both injury and disease can guide preemptive and responsive efforts to reduce death among military forces.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Medicine

Reference27 articles.

1. Joint Publication 3-0, Joint Operations, January 17, 2017, Incorporating Change 1, October 22, 2018;Joint Chiefs of Staff

2. Causes of death in US Special Operations Forces in the global war on terrorism: 2001–2004;Holcomb;Ann Surg,2007

3. Injury severity and causes of death from Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom: 2003–2004 versus 2006;Kelly;J Trauma Acute Care Surg,2008

4. Eliminating preventable death on the battlefield;Kotwal;Arch Surg,2011

5. Died of wounds on the battlefield: causation and implications for improving combat casualty care;Eastridge;J Trauma,2011

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3