Fear Avoidance Beliefs in Upper-Extremity Musculoskeletal Pain Conditions: Secondary Analysis of a Prospective Clinical Study on Digital Care Programs

Author:

Janela Dora1ORCID,Costa Fabíola1ORCID,Molinos Maria1ORCID,Moulder Robert G2ORCID,Lains Jorge34ORCID,Scheer Justin K5ORCID,Bento Virgílio1ORCID,Yanamadala Vijay167ORCID,Cohen Steven P89ORCID,Correia Fernando Dias110ORCID

Affiliation:

1. SWORD Health, Inc , Draper, Utah, USA

2. Institute for Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder , Boulder, Colorado, USA

3. PM&R, Rovisco Pais Medical and Rehabilitation Centre , Tocha, Portugal

4. PM&R, Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra University , Coimbra, Portugal

5. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California , San Francisco, California, USA

6. Department of Surgery, Quinnipiac University Frank H. Netter School of Medicine , Hamden, Connecticut, USA

7. Department of Neurosurgery, Hartford Healthcare Medical Group , Westport, Connecticut, USA

8. Departments of Anesthesiology & Critical Care Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Neurology, and Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland, USA

9. Departments of Anesthesiology and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences , Bethesda, Maryland, USA

10. Neurology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário do Porto , Porto, Portugal

Abstract

Abstract Background Fear-avoidance beliefs (FAB) have been associated with poorer prognosis and decreased adherence to exercise-based treatments in musculoskeletal (MSK) pain. However, the impact of high FAB on adherence and outcomes in upper extremity MSK (UEMSK) pain is poorly explored, particularly through exercise-based digital care programs (DCP). Objective Assess the adherence levels, clinical outcomes and satisfaction in patients with UEMSK pain and elevated FAB after a fully remote multimodal DCP. Associations between FABQ-PA and clinical outcomes were conducted. Methods Secondary analysis of an ongoing clinical trial. Participants with UEMSK pain (shoulder, elbow, and wrist/hand) and elevated FAB-physical activity (FABQ-PA ≥ 15) were included. Adherence (completion rate, sessions/week, total exercise time) and mean change in clinical outcomes—disability (QuickDASH), numerical pain score, FABQ-PA, anxiety (GAD-7), and depression (PHQ-9)—between baseline and end-of-program were assessed. Associations between FABQ-PA and clinical outcomes were conducted. Results 520 participants were included, with mean baseline FABQ-PA of 18.02 (SD 2.77). Patients performed on average 29.3 exercise sessions (2.8 sessions/week), totalizing 338.2 exercise minutes. Mean satisfaction was 8.5/10 (SD 1.7). Significant improvements were observed in all clinical outcomes. Higher baseline FAB were associated with higher baseline disability (P < .001), and smaller improvements in disability (P < .001) and pain (P = .001). Higher engagement was associated with greater improvements in FABQ-PA (P = .043) and pain (P = 0.009). Conclusions This study provides evidence of the potential benefits of a structured and multimodal home-based DCP in the management of UEMSK pain conditions in patients with elevated FAB in a real-world context.

Funder

SWORD Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Neurology (clinical),General Medicine

Reference49 articles.

1. Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019;Cieza;Lancet,2020

2. Shoulder rotator cuff disorders: A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and semantic analyses of recommendations;Doiron-Cadrin;Arch Phys Med Rehabil,2020

3. 2019 American College of Rheumatology/Arthritis Foundation guideline for the management of osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee;Kolasinski;Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken),2020

4. A model to increase rehabilitation adherence to home exercise programmes in patients with varying levels of self-efficacy;Picha;Musculoskelet Care,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3