Affiliation:
1. Uppsala University and Queen’s University , Sweden
Abstract
Abstract
Public health ethics is commonly analyzed within a consequentialist or rights-based perspective, but recent approaches explore public health from a virtue ethical perspective. Rozier focuses on the virtues of individual members of the public and I discuss public health professionals. MacKay emphasizes the role of the collective level, the practice and social structure of public health. The structure can be important in two ways. First, it potentially affects the cultivation of the virtues of individuals. Second, the structure itself could have virtues. MacKay defends the latter notion and argues that structures become objective reality that is non-reducible to individuals. She implicitly describes public health as an actor, as having hopes and aspirations. MacKay’s account is an interesting contribution to the field. I agree with that the social structure is important but argue that it is primarily important in relation to the cultivation of individual virtues. Public health is not an agent and if it is described as such, it needs a supporting argument concerning moral group agency. I argue that there are no collectives without individuals. Future studies should focus on the links between the individual and social levels and discuss which virtues are the most important.
Funder
Matariki Fellowship, Uppsala University and Queen’s University
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Health Policy,Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Reference12 articles.
1. Collective Responsibility;Cooper;Philosophy,1968
2. Structures of Virtue and Vice;Daly;New Blackfriars,2011
3. Why Ethics Codes Don’t Work;Dobson;Financial Analysts Journal,2003
4. The Corporation as a Moral Person;French;American Philosophical Quarterly,1979
5. The Metaphysics of Collective Agency
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献