Clinical outcomes for pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma patients

Author:

Sullivan Jared J1,Chandler James P2,Lesniak Maciej S2,Tate Matthew C2,Sonabend Adam M2,Kalapurakal John A1,Horbinski Craig M3,Lukas Rimas V4,Kumthekar Priya U4ORCID,Sachdev Sean1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Lou and Jean Malnati Brain Tumor Institute, Northwestern University Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center , Chicago, Illinois , USA

2. Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern Lou and Jean Malnati Brain Tumor Institute, Northwestern University Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center , Chicago, Illinois , USA

3. Department of Pathology, Division of Neuropathology, Northwestern Lou and Jean Malnati Brain Tumor Institute, Northwestern University Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center , Chicago, Illinois , USA

4. Department of Neurology, Division of Neuro-Oncology, Northwestern Lou and Jean Malnati Brain Tumor Institute, Northwestern University Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center , Chicago, Illinois , USA

Abstract

Abstract Background Report our institutional experience with pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA) to contribute to limited data on optimal management. Methods Patients with pathologically confirmed PXA treated at our institution between 1990 and 2019 were identified. Demographic information, tumor grade, treatment variables, and clinical outcomes were collected from patient charts. Kaplan–Meier estimates were used to summarize 2 primary outcome measurements: progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Outcomes were stratified by tumor grade and extent of resection. Cox regression and log-rank testing were performed. Results We identified 17 patients with pathologically confirmed PXA. Two patients were excluded due to incomplete treatment information or <6 m of follow-up; 15 patients were analyzed (median follow-up 4.4 years). Six patients had grade 2 PXA and 9 had grade 3 anaplastic PXA. The 2- and 5-year PFS for the cohort was 57% and 33%, respectively; 2- and 5-year OS was 93% and 75%, respectively. Patients with grade 2 tumors exhibited superior PFS compared to those with grade 3 tumors (2-year PFS: 100% vs. 28%, 5-year PFS: 60% vs. 14%), hazard ratio, 5.09 (95% CI: 1.06–24.50), P = .02. Undergoing a gross total resection was associated with numerical longer survival but this was not of statistical significance (hazard ratio: 0.38, P = .15). All but one (89%) of the grade 3 patients underwent RT. Conclusions The poor survival of the cohort, especially with grade 3 tumors, suggests the need for more aggressive treatment, including maximal resection followed by intensive adjuvant therapy. Better prognostics of tumor recurrence are needed to guide the use of adjuvant therapy.

Funder

Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3