A comparison between similarity matrices for principal component analysis to assess population stratification in sequenced genetic data sets

Author:

Lee Sanghun1234ORCID,Hahn Georg1ORCID,Hecker Julian25ORCID,Lutz Sharon M156ORCID,Mullin Kristina7,Hide Winston58ORCID,Bertram Lars910ORCID,DeMeo Dawn L25ORCID,Tanzi Rudolph E57ORCID,Lange Christoph12ORCID,Prokopenko Dmitry57ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Harvard University Department of Biostatistics, T.H. Chan School of Public Health, , Boston, MA , USA

2. Brigham and Women’s Hospital Channing Division of Network Medicine, , Boston, MA , USA

3. Dankook University Department of Medical Consilience, Division of Medicine, Graduate school, , Sout h Korea

4. NH Institute for Natural Product Research, Myungji Hospital , Sout h Korea

5. Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA , USA

6. Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute Department of Population Medicine, , Boston, MA , USA

7. Massachusetts General Hospital Genetics and Aging Unit and McCance Center for Brain Health, Department of Neurology, , Boston, MA , USA

8. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Department of Pathology, , Boston, MA , USA

9. University of Lübeck Lübeck Interdisciplinary Platform for Genome Analytics, , Lübeck , Germany

10. University of Oslo Department of Psychology, , Oslo, Norway

Abstract

Abstract Genetic similarity matrices are commonly used to assess population substructure (PS) in genetic studies. Through simulation studies and by the application to whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data, we evaluate the performance of three genetic similarity matrices: the unweighted and weighted Jaccard similarity matrices and the genetic relationship matrix. We describe different scenarios that can create numerical pitfalls and lead to incorrect conclusions in some instances. We consider scenarios in which PS is assessed based on loci that are located across the genome (‘globally’) and based on loci from a specific genomic region (‘locally’). We also compare scenarios in which PS is evaluated based on loci from different minor allele frequency bins: common (>5%), low-frequency (5–0.5%) and rare (<0.5%) single-nucleotide variations (SNVs). Overall, we observe that all approaches provide the best clustering performance when computed based on rare SNVs. The performance of the similarity matrices is very similar for common and low-frequency variants, but for rare variants, the unweighted Jaccard matrix provides preferable clustering features. Based on visual inspection and in terms of standard clustering metrics, its clusters are the densest and the best separated in the principal component analysis of variants with rare SNVs compared with the other methods and different allele frequency cutoffs. In an application, we assessed the role of rare variants on local and global PS, using WGS data from multiethnic Alzheimer’s disease data sets and European or East Asian populations from the 1000 Genome Project.

Funder

National Institute of Mental Health

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

National Human Genome Research Institute

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Molecular Biology,Information Systems

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3