Abstract
Abstract
This paper revisits the conception of heterodox economics advanced by Tony Lawson in 2006 and critically assesses its reception. I consider the bearing of later contributions—most importantly, his 2013 paper ‘What is this “school” called neoclassical economics’—in which Lawson further develops his analysis of heterodox economics. The goal is to provide additional clarity to the discussion.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference48 articles.
1. Post-Keynesianism: a new approach to economics;Arestis;Review of Social Economy,1990
2. The changing face of mainstream economics;Colander;Review of Political Economy,2004
3. Neoclassical, mainstream, orthodox, and heterodox economics;Dequech;Journal of Post Keynesian Economics,2007
4. Post Keynesian school;Dow,1992
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献