The problematic nature and consequences of the effort to force Keynes into the conceptual cul-de-sac of Walrasian economics-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The problematic nature and consequences of the effort to force Keynes into the conceptual cul-de-sac of Walrasian economics

Published:2018-10-23 Issue:3 Volume:43 Page:769-783
ISSN:0309-166X
Container-title:Cambridge Journal of Economics
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Pernecky Mark,Wojick Paul¹

Affiliation:

1. St. Olaf College

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Economics and Econometrics

Link

http://academic.oup.com/cje/article-pdf/43/3/769/28325414/bey039.pdf

Reference60 articles.

1. The development of contemporary mainstream macroeconomics: vision, ideology, and theory debate;Chase;Nebraska Journal of Economics and Business,1981

2. On knowing ones place: the role of formalism in economics;Chick;The Economic Journal,1998

3. The Claims of Common Sense

4. Reality and economic theory;Davidson;Journal of Post Keynesian Economics,1996

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Keynes and the drunkard under the lamp post: Making sense of Palley;The Japanese Political Economy;2024-01-02

2. Capitalism and crises: A comparative analysis of mainstream and heterodox perceptions and related ethical considerations;Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility;2022-02-25

3. Cambridge, That Was: The Crucible of Heterodox Economics;Palgrave Studies in the History of Economic Thought;2022

4. General Theorizing and Historical Specificity in the ‘Keynes Versus the Classics’ Dispute;Eastern Economic Journal;2020-10-06

5. Keynes, Kuhn and the sociology of knowledge: a comment on Pernecky and Wojick;Cambridge Journal of Economics;2020-06-30