Total energy expenditure measured using doubly labeled water compared with estimated energy requirements in older adults (≥65 y): analysis of primary data

Author:

Porter Judi12ORCID,Nguo Kay1ORCID,Collins Jorja1ORCID,Kellow Nicole1ORCID,Huggins Catherine E1,Gibson Simone1ORCID,Davidson Zoe1,Schoeller Dale3,Prentice Ross4,Neuhouser Marian L5ORCID,Snetselaar Linda6,Truby Helen1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Nutrition, Dietetics, and Food, Monash University, Notting Hill, Victoria, Australia

2. Allied Health Clinical Research Office, Eastern Health, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia

3. Nutritional Sciences and Biotechnology Center, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, USA

4. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

5. Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA

6. College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Contemporary energy expenditure data are crucial to inform and guide nutrition policy in older adults to optimize nutrition and health. Objective The aim was to determine the optimal method of estimating total energy expenditure (TEE) in adults (aged ≥65 y) through 1) establishing which published predictive equations have the closest agreement between measured resting metabolic rate (RMR) and predicted RMR and 2) utilizing the RMR equations with the best agreement to predict TEE against the reference method of doubly labeled water (DLW). Methods A database consisting of international participant-level TEE data from DLW studies was developed to enable comparison with energy requirements estimated by 17 commonly used predictive equations. This database included 31 studies comprising 988 participant-level RMR data and 1488 participant-level TEE data. Mean physical activity level (PAL) was determined for men (PAL = 1.69, n = 320) and women (PAL = 1.66, n = 668). Bland–Altman plots assessed agreement of measured RMR and TEE with predicted RMR and TEE in adults aged ≥65 y, and subgroups of 65–79 y and ≥80 y. Linear regression assessed proportional bias. Results The Ikeda, Livingston, and Mifflin equations most closely agreed with measured RMR and TEE in all adults aged ≥65 y and in the 65–79 y and ≥80 y subgroups. In adults aged ≥65 y, the Ikeda and Livingston equations overestimated TEE by a mean ± SD of 175 ± 1362 kJ/d and 86 ± 1344 kJ/d, respectively. The Mifflin equation underestimated TEE by a mean ± SD of 24 ± 1401 kJ/d. Proportional bias was present as energy expenditure increased. Conclusions The Ikeda, Livingston, or Mifflin equations are recommended for estimating energy requirements of older adults. Future research should focus on developing predictive equations to meet the requirements of the older population with consideration given to body composition and functional measures.

Funder

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

National Institutes of Health

US Department of Health and Human Services

Eastern Health Foundation

Monash University Vacation Scholarship

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Nutrition and Dietetics,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference36 articles.

1. Facing up to the global challenges of ageing;Partridge;Nature,2018

2. Measurement of energy expenditure in humans by doubly labeled water method;Schoeller;J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol,1982

Cited by 25 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3