Does kidney transplantation with a standard or expanded criteria donor improve patient survival? Results from a Belgian cohort

Author:

Hellemans Rachel1,Kramer Anneke2ORCID,De Meester Johan3,Collart Frederic4,Kuypers Dirk5,Jadoul Michel6ORCID,Van Laecke Steven7,Le Moine Alain8,Krzesinski Jean-Marie9ORCID,Wissing Karl Martin10ORCID,Luyckx Kim11,van Meel Marieke12,de Vries Erwin12,Tieken Ineke12,Vogelaar Serge12,Samuel Undine13,Abramowicz Daniel1,Stel Vianda S2,Jager Kitty J2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Nephrology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium

2. Department of Medical Informatics, ERA-EDTA Registry, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

3. Nederlandstalige Belgische Vereniging voor Nefrologie, Sint-Niklaas, Belgium

4. Groupement des Néphrologues Francophones de Belgique, Liège, Belgium

5. Department of Nephrology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

6. Département de Néphrologie, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium

7. Department of Internal Medicine, Renal Division, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium

8. Département de Néphrologie, Hôpital Erasme–Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium

9. Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège, Service de Néphrologie, Liège, Belgium

10. Department of Nephrology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussel, Belgium

11. Department of Informatics, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium

12. Eurotransplant International Foundation, Leiden, The Netherlands

13. Eurotransplant International  Foundation, Leiden, The Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract Background Changes in recipient and donor factors have reopened the question of survival benefits of kidney transplantation versus dialysis. Methods We analysed survival among 3808 adult Belgian patients waitlisted for a first deceased donor kidney transplant from 2000 to 2012. The primary outcome was mortality during the median waiting time plus 3 years of follow-up after transplantation or with continued dialysis. Outcomes were analysed separately for standard criteria donor (SCD) and expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidney transplants. We adjusted survival analyses for recipient age (20–44, 45–64 and ≥65 years), sex and diabetes as the primary renal disease. Results Among patients ≥65 years of age, only SCD transplantation provided a significant survival benefit compared with dialysis, with a mortality of 16.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 13.2–19.9] with SCD transplantation, 20.5% (95% CI 16.1–24.6) with ECD transplantation and 24.6% (95% CI 19.4–29.5) with continued dialysis. Relative mortality risk was increased in the first months after transplantation compared with dialysis, with equivalent risk levels reached earlier with SCD than ECD transplantation in all age groups. Conclusions The results of this study suggest that older patients might gain a survival benefit with SCD transplantation versus dialysis, but any survival benefit with ECD transplantation versus dialysis may be small.

Funder

ERA-EDTA Fellowship award

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Transplantation,Nephrology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3