Abstract
AbstractThe nation state is discovering the limits of its crisis management capacities. The Ebola and Zika outbreaks, the financial crisis, the downing of flight MH17 over Ukraine, sinking ships overfilled with refugees, cyber-attacks, urban terrorism and existential environmental threats serve as strong reminders of the complex origins and transboundary dimensions of many contemporary crises and disasters. As these transboundary aspects of modern crises become increasingly manifest, the need for international, collaborative responses appears ever clearer. But that collaboration does not always emerge in time (or at all). Even in the European Union, which has various transboundary crisis management mechanisms in place, the willingness to initiate joint crisis responses varies. This observation prompted our research question: Why do states collaborate in response to some transboundary crises but not others? We bring together the crisis and collective action literatures to formulate a theoretical framework that can help answer this question. This article identifies crucial factors that facilitate a possible pathway toward a joint response.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference132 articles.
1. Common resources and institutional sustainability;Agrawal,2002
2. Collaborative governance in theory and practice;Ansell;Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,2008
3. Managing transboundary crises: Identifying the building blocks of an effective response system;Ansell;Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management,2010
4. The European Union’s capacities for managing crises;Backman;Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management,2018
Cited by
37 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献