Inviting, Affording and Translating Harm: Understanding the Role of Technological Mediation in Technology-Facilitated Violence

Author:

Wood Mark A1,Mitchell Matthew2,Pervan Flynn3,Anderson Briony3,O’Neill Tully2,Wood Jackson3,Arpke-Wales Will3

Affiliation:

1. School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Deakin University , 221 Burwood Hwy, Burwood, VIC 3125 , Australia

2. La Trobe University , Bundoora, VIC 3086 , Australia

3. University of Melbourne , Parkville, VIC 3010 , Australia

Abstract

Abstract Technologies not only extend capabilities but also mediate experience and action. To date, however, research on technology-facilitated violence has tended not to focus on the role technological mediation plays in acts of violence facilitated through technology. Building on prior work in the field, this article develops a theoretical framework and typology for understanding the role technological mediation plays in producing technology-facilitated violence. First, drawing on postphenomenological theories of technology, we argue that technology-facilitated violence is best understood as a form of ‘harm translation,’ where a technology’s affordances and other properties ‘invite’ an individual to actualize harmful ends. Then, distinguishing between four modes of harm translation, we construct a typology for analysing the intersections between user intention and technological design that, together, facilitate violence. We argue that by attending to these distinctions our typology may help researchers and designers identify and address the specific causal dynamics involved in producing different kinds of technology-facilitated harm.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Law,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Social Psychology,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference62 articles.

1. ‘Magnetic and multistable: Reinterpreting the affordances of educational technology’,;Aagaard;International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education,2018

2. The De-Scription of Technical Objects’,;Akrich,1992

3. ‘Harm Imbrication and Virtualised Violence: Reconceptualising the Harms of Doxxing’,;Anderson;International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy,2022

4. A Dynamic Theory of Causation’,;Anjum,2018

5. ‘Unintended Consequences: a Typology and Examples’,;Baert;International Sociology,1991

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3