Abstract
The most powerful democracy is detaining hundreds of suspected foot soldiers of the Taliban in a legal black hole at the United States naval base at Guantanamo Bay, where they await trial on capital charges by military tribunals. This episode must be put in context. Democracies must defend themselves. Democracies are entitled to try officers and soldiers of enemy forces for war crimes. But it is a recurring theme in history that in times of war, armed conflict, or perceived national danger, even liberal democracies adopt measures infringing human rights in ways that are wholly disproportionate to the crisis. One tool at hand is detention without charge or trial, that is, executive detention. Ill-conceived rushed legislation is passed granting excessive powers to executive governments which compromise the rights and liberties of individuals beyond the exigencies of the situation. Often the loss of liberty is permanent. Executive branches of government, faced with a perceived emergency, often resort to excessive measures. The litany of grave abuses of power by liberal democratic governments is too long to recount, but in order to understand and to hold governments to account, we do well to take intoaccount the circles of history.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations
Reference44 articles.
1. R (Abbasi) v The Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs [2002] EWCA Civ 1598.
2. M Kerr As Far As I Remember (Oxford Hart 2002).
3. Call for release of ‘low-level’ Guantanamo inmates;Borger;The Guardian,2002
4. Proc 7463 ‘Declaration of National Emergency by Reason of Certain Terrorist Attacks’.
5. Aldrich George H , The Taliban, Al-Qaeda, and The Determination of Illegal Combatants, 96 AJIL 891.
Cited by
94 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献