Affiliation:
1. Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
2. University of Western Santa Catarina, Xanxerê, Santa Catarina, Brazil
Abstract
Abstract
A natural dependence among diameters measured within-tree is expected in taper data due to the hierarchical structure. The aim of this paper was to introduce the covariance generalized linear model (CGLM) framework in the context of forest biometrics for Pinus taeda stem form modeling. The CGLMs are based on marginal specification, which requires a definition of the mean and covariance components. The tree stem mean profiles were modeled by a nonlinear segmented model. The covariance matrix was built considering four strategies of linear combinations of known matrices, which expressed the variance or correlations among observations. The first strategy modeled only the variance of the diameters over the stem as a function of covariates, the second modeled correlation among observations, the third was defined based on a random walk model, the fourth was based on a structure similar to a mixed-effect model with a marginal specification, and the fourth was a traditional mixed-effect model. Mean squared error and bias showed that the approaches were similar for describing the mean profile for fitting and validation dataset. However, uncertainties expressed by confidence intervals of the relative diameters were significant and related to the matrix covariance structures of the CGLMs.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Ecological Modeling,Ecology,Forestry
Reference46 articles.
1. Fitting and calibrating a multilevel mixed-effects stem taper model for maritime pine in NW Spain;Arias-Rodil;Plos One,2015
2. Effects of measurement error in total tree height and upper-stem diameter on stem volume prediction;Arias-Rodil;For. Sci.,2017
3. Modeling and localizing a stem taper function for Pinus radiata in Spain;Arias-Rodil;Can. J. For. Res.,2015
4. Effects of measurement errors on individual tree stem volume estimates for the Austrian National Forest Inventory;Berger;For. Sci.,2014
5. Modelling mixed types of outcomes in additive genetic models;Bonat;Int. J. Biol.,2017