Application of the Fluorescence Method on Sysmex XN9000 Hematology Analyzer for Correcting Platelet Count in Individuals with Microcytosis

Abstract

Abstract Objective Although small red blood cells are a well-known analytical pitfall that could cause artifactual increase of the platelet count, limited information is available on the accuracy of impedance platelet counting in cases with microcytosis. The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of impedance platelet counting in the presence of small red blood cells, and to establish the optimal mean corpuscular volume (MCV) cutoff to endorse fluorescence platelet counting. Methods In this study, platelet counts estimated by the impedance method on the Sysmex XN9000 analyzer (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan) were compared with those provided by the fluorescence method. The accuracy of impedance platelet counting was assessed. Receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the performance of MCV in predicting falsely increased platelet counts. Results There was a tendency for the impedance method to overestimate the platelet count in samples with 70 fL < MCV ≤ 80 fL, 60 fL < MCV ≤ 70 fL, MCV ≤ 60 fL. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that a 73.5fL cutoff of MCV was highly sensitive in predicting falsely increased platelet counts. Conclusion In cases with MCV < 73.5 fL, we strongly suggest that the platelet counts obtained by the impedance method on the Sysmex XN9000 analyzer should be checked and corrected by fluorescence counting.