Affiliation:
1. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Anting Hospital, Jiading District, Shanghai, China
2. Department of Clinical Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
3. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
4. Digestive Internal Medicine, Kunshan Branch of Shanghai Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
5. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Dongfang Hospital affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai, China
6. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Jiading District Central Hospital Affiliated Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai, China
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
To compare the levels of serum pepsinogen (PG) in patients with gastric cancer (GC), patients with atrophic gastritis (AG), and healthy donors. Also, we explored the clinical value of PG detection for the diagnosis and treatment of GC.
Methods
The PG level in peripheral blood from patients and heathy donors was determined using an Abbott automatic chemiluminescence instrument. The study included 117 patients with GC confirmed by gastroscopy and histopathology, of whom 13 patients had cancer at stage I, 47 at stage II, 41 at stage III, and 16 at stage IV. The AG group included 122 patients, and the control group had 120 healthy donors. The relationship between serum PG levels and the occurrence and development of GC, as well as the evaluation of the clinical value of diagnostic tests based on serum PG detection, were investigated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses.
Results
Pepsinogen I (PGI) levels gradually decreased from the control group, the AG group, and the GC group.
PGI exhibited high diagnostic value for GC (area under the curve [AUC], 0.834; cutoff, 51.2 ng/mL, sensitivity, 81.7%; specificity, 68.4%), PGII (AUC, 0.587; cutoff value, 13.05 ng/mL; sensitivity, 65.8%; specificity, 53.8%), and PGR (AUC, 0.752; cutoff, 5.65; sensitivity, 54.2%; specificity, 87.2%). The occurrence of GC was negatively correlated with serum levels of PGI (B = −0.054; OR = 0.947; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.925–0.970; P <.001) and PGR (B = −0.420; OR = 0.657; 95% CI, 0.499–0.864; P = .003).
Conclusions
The combined detection of PGI, PGII, and PGR has important clinical value for the screening, prevention, and diagnosis of GC and could allow for earlier detection, diagnosis, and treatment of GC.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Shanghai Science and Technology Project Fund
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry