Affiliation:
1. Institute of Anthropology and Ethnology, Adam Mickiewicz University , Poznań 61-614, Poland
Abstract
Abstract
For over six decades the Tibetan diaspora in India has followed a strategy of ‘non-assimilation’ towards Indian society. A majority of Tibetans still reside in self-governed settlements and maintain their self-imposed statelessness. Tibetan refugees have constructed boundaries that—according to the diaspora leaders—enable them to continue their political struggle for a free Tibet while in a state of protracted exile and imposed waiting. In this article, based on long-term ethnographic research, I discuss the mechanisms and rationale of this boundary-making by exploring its spatial, educational, and political dimensions. I then analyse the political activism which takes place within those boundaries, with a special focus on second-generation Tibetan refugees. I scrutinize the internal divisions in the Tibetan freedom movement, the radicalization of struggle, and the everyday patriotism practiced by generations born in exile, demonstrating that waiting has the potential to produce resistance.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference76 articles.
1. (Re)Imagining Nationalism: Identity and Representation in the Tibetan Diaspora of South Asia;Anand;Contemporary South Asia,2000
2. A Contemporary Story of “Diaspora”: The Tibetan Version;Anand;Diaspora,2003
3. The Art of Dying? Gandhian Principles and Tibetan Protest;Ardley;Tibetan Review,1998